Mendisco Mining (ALJ decision, November 18, 1991)

Mendisco Mining (FMSHRC WEST 91-230-M): Default entered and $800 in penalties assessed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 91-230-M
Decided
November 18, 1991
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1991
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA sought civil penalties against Mendisco Mining for four citations. The operator received notice of the hearing but did not appear, did not communicate its intentions, and repeatedly ignored orders and contact efforts. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. entered the operator's default and assessed the four proposed $200 penalties as final. Mendisco Mining was ordered to pay $800 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(d)
  • Outcome: The four citations and their penalties were affirmed after the operator defaulted, and $800 was ordered paid.
  • Key point: An operator that receives adequate hearing notice but fails to appear or respond may have a default entered against it.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MENDISCO MINING
DDATE:
19911118
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1833
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 91-230-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 05-01780-05503

v. September Morn

MENDISCO MINING,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner.

Before: Judge Lasher

This matter arises upon the filing of a proposal for penalty by the Petitioner (MSHA) on April 15, 1991, seeking assessment of civil penalties ($200 each) against Respondent for four violations described in four Citations which were issued pursuant to Section 104(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 815(d) (1977).

At the hearing in this matter in Grand Junction, Colorado, on October 24, 1991, Petitioner, as above indicated, was represented by legal counsel. Respondent, which the record shows received actual notice of the hearing (a Postal Service green card attached to the notice of hearing in the Commission's official case file reflects its receipt of the notice of hearing by certified mail on September 17, 1991), neither appeared nor advised the presiding Judge or counsel for Petitioner of its intent not to appear. Indeed, it clearly appears that Respondent repeatedly ignored various orders of this tribunal and efforts of Petitioner's counsel to communicate with it.

At hearing, a full exposition of Respondent's repeated failures was made and after determination of the facts and examination of the case file, it was determined that:

1. Respondent had abandoned its position and interest in this proceeding;

2. Respondent had become incommunicado; and


Page 3

~1834
3. Respondent had failed to appear at the hearing, even though it had received more than adequate notice and despite efforts of counsel (at my direction) to personally contact it regarding its intentions.

Accordingly, by decision issued from the bench on the record, the default of the Respondent was entered and the penalties initially proposed by MSHA were ordered assessed as final. That decision is here AFFIRMED.

ORDER

Respondent SHALL within 30 days from the date of this decision PAY to the Secretary of Labor the total sum of $800 as and for the civil penalties previously assessed ($200 each for Citations numbered 3631073, 3631077, 3631078, and 3631075).

Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace