Mid-Continent Resources Inc. (ALJ decision, June 21, 1993)

Mid-Continent Resources Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 91-168): Partial settlement approved and decision amended

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 91-168
Decided
June 21, 1993
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-14

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1993
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Mid-Continent Resources Inc. faced five orders involving alleged mine-safety violations at the Dutch Creek Mine. One order was pending discretionary review and another had already been reassessed and settled in a different docket, so Judge John J. Morris deleted both from this proceeding. The parties agreed to reduce the proposed penalties for the remaining three orders from $3,700 to $2,220, and the judge approved the partial settlement. The order affirmed the remaining citations and authorized a $2,200 civil-penalty assessment as a bankruptcy claim upon approval by the bankruptcy court.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.400, 75.316, 75.499, and 75.1704, plus 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
  • Outcome: Two orders were deleted from the proceeding, three citations and amended penalties were affirmed, and a $2,200 assessment was authorized as a bankruptcy claim.
  • Key point: A partial settlement can remove orders resolved elsewhere while leaving the remaining citations affirmed at reduced penalties.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5266/FAX 303-844-5268

June 21, 1993

SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 91-168
Petitioner : A.C. No. 05-00301-03764
:
v. : Dutch Creek Mine
:
MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES INC., :
Respondent
:

AMENDED DECISION APPROVING PARTIAL SETTLEMENT

Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner;
Edward Mulhall, Jr., Esq., Glenwood Springs, Colorado, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Morris

This is a civil penalty proceeding initiated by Petitioner against Respondent pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801, et seq. (the "Act"). The civil penalties sought here are for the violation of mandatory regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act.

1. Respondent was issued five orders herein pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 as follows:

Citation/Order
30 C.F.R.
Number Date Regulation

        3410800              May 01, 1990              75.400
        3410363              May 02, 1990              75.316
        3410351              May 29, 1990              75.499
        3410391              June 19, 1990             75.316
        3411019              June 27, 1990             75.1704

2. However, one of the orders, Order No. 3410351, is the subject matter of a discretionary review now pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission in Docket Nos. WEST 91-594 and WEST 91-626. Order No. 3410351 was erroneously included in the decision for partial settlement as well as the order of the Commission entered thereon.

3. Order No. 3410800 was reassessed and settled in Docket No. WEST 92-717, therefore, it should be deleted from this civil penalty proceeding.

4. Respondent has previously agreed to reduce the proposed penalties of the remaining orders by 40 percent based on Respondent's ability to pay.

5. Accordingly, Petitioner has previously agreed to amend the proposed penalties as follows. Such amendment is to be effective upon the approval of this settlement agreement by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

Amended
Order No. Proposed Penalty Proposed Penalty

      3410363           $1,000.00             $   600.00
      3410391            1,100.00                 660.00
      3411019            1,600.00                 960.00

$3,700.00
$2,220.00

In support of their motion, the parties submitted information relating to the statutory criteria for assessing civil penalties as contained in 30 U.S.C. § 820(i).

I have reviewed the proposed settlement and I find it is reasonable and in the public interest. It should be approved.

Accordingly, I enter the following:

ORDER

1. Order No. 3410351 was erroneously included in the motion for settlement as well as in the Order of the Commission entered thereon and said Order is deleted from this amended decision.

2. Order No. 3410800 was reassessed and settled in WEST 92-717. Accordingly, it is deleted from this penalty proceeding.

3. Citation Nos. 3580363, 3410391, and 3411019, and the amended proposed penalties are AFFIRMED.

4. Respondent filed a case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and is operating its bankruptcy estate as a debtor-in-possession. Accordingly, upon approval of the United States Bankruptcy Court in Case No. 91-11658 PAC, it is ORDERED that civil penalties be assessed against the Respondent in the amount of $2,200.00 and Petitioner is authorized to assert such assessment as a claim in Respondent's Bankruptcy case.

5. The undersigned Judge retains jurisdiction of this case and related cases not otherwise disposed of by the settlement herein.

John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1585 Federal Office Building, 1961 Stout Street,
Denver, CO 80294 (Certified Mail)

Edward Mulhall, Jr., Esq., DELANEY & BALCOMB, P.C., P.O. Drawer
790, 818 Colorado Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (Certified
Mail)

ek

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace