Mid-Continent Resources Inc. (ALJ decision, June 21, 1993)
Mid-Continent Resources Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 91-168): Partial settlement approved and decision amended
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1993 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Mid-Continent Resources Inc. faced five orders involving alleged mine-safety violations at the Dutch Creek Mine. One order was pending discretionary review and another had already been reassessed and settled in a different docket, so Judge John J. Morris deleted both from this proceeding. The parties agreed to reduce the proposed penalties for the remaining three orders from $3,700 to $2,220, and the judge approved the partial settlement. The order affirmed the remaining citations and authorized a $2,200 civil-penalty assessment as a bankruptcy claim upon approval by the bankruptcy court.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 75.400, 75.316, 75.499, and 75.1704, plus 30 U.S.C. § 820(i)
- Outcome: Two orders were deleted from the proceeding, three citations and amended penalties were affirmed, and a $2,200 assessment was authorized as a bankruptcy claim.
- Key point: A partial settlement can remove orders resolved elsewhere while leaving the remaining citations affirmed at reduced penalties.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1244 SPEER BOULEVARD #280
DENVER, CO 80204-3582
(303) 844-5266/FAX 303-844-5268
June 21, 1993
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 91-168
Petitioner : A.C. No. 05-00301-03764
:
v. : Dutch Creek Mine
:
MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES INC., :
Respondent
:
AMENDED DECISION APPROVING PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner;
Edward Mulhall, Jr., Esq., Glenwood Springs, Colorado, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Morris
This is a civil penalty proceeding initiated by Petitioner against Respondent pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801, et seq. (the "Act"). The civil penalties sought here are for the violation of mandatory regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act.
1. Respondent was issued five orders herein pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 as follows:
Citation/Order
30 C.F.R.
Number Date Regulation
3410800 May 01, 1990 75.400
3410363 May 02, 1990 75.316
3410351 May 29, 1990 75.499
3410391 June 19, 1990 75.316
3411019 June 27, 1990 75.1704
2. However, one of the orders, Order No. 3410351, is the subject matter of a discretionary review now pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission in Docket Nos. WEST 91-594 and WEST 91-626. Order No. 3410351 was erroneously included in the decision for partial settlement as well as the order of the Commission entered thereon.
3. Order No. 3410800 was reassessed and settled in Docket No. WEST 92-717, therefore, it should be deleted from this civil penalty proceeding.
4. Respondent has previously agreed to reduce the proposed penalties of the remaining orders by 40 percent based on Respondent's ability to pay.
5. Accordingly, Petitioner has previously agreed to amend the proposed penalties as follows. Such amendment is to be effective upon the approval of this settlement agreement by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.
Amended
Order No. Proposed Penalty Proposed Penalty
3410363 $1,000.00 $ 600.00
3410391 1,100.00 660.00
3411019 1,600.00 960.00
$3,700.00
$2,220.00
In support of their motion, the parties submitted information relating to the statutory criteria for assessing civil penalties as contained in 30 U.S.C. § 820(i).
I have reviewed the proposed settlement and I find it is reasonable and in the public interest. It should be approved.
Accordingly, I enter the following:
ORDER
1. Order No. 3410351 was erroneously included in the motion for settlement as well as in the Order of the Commission entered thereon and said Order is deleted from this amended decision.
2. Order No. 3410800 was reassessed and settled in WEST 92-717. Accordingly, it is deleted from this penalty proceeding.
3. Citation Nos. 3580363, 3410391, and 3411019, and the amended proposed penalties are AFFIRMED.
4. Respondent filed a case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and is operating its bankruptcy estate as a debtor-in-possession. Accordingly, upon approval of the United States Bankruptcy Court in Case No. 91-11658 PAC, it is ORDERED that civil penalties be assessed against the Respondent in the amount of $2,200.00 and Petitioner is authorized to assert such assessment as a claim in Respondent's Bankruptcy case.
5. The undersigned Judge retains jurisdiction of this case and related cases not otherwise disposed of by the settlement herein.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 1585 Federal Office Building, 1961 Stout Street,
Denver, CO 80294 (Certified Mail)
Edward Mulhall, Jr., Esq., DELANEY & BALCOMB, P.C., P.O. Drawer
790, 818 Colorado Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (Certified
Mail)
ek
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace