Energy Fuels Coal, Inc.
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 90-8 and WEST 89-247-R): Settlement approved and penalty reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Energy Fuels Coal and the Secretary settled related contest and civil penalty proceedings involving the Southfield Mine. The settlement removed the significant-and-substantial designation from Citation No. 2875336 and reduced its proposed penalty from $225 to $125. Withdrawal Order No. 3077162 was vacated, and the company withdrew its contest. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved the settlement and dismissed both dockets.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provision: 30 U.S.C. § 814(b)
- Outcome: Citation No. 2875336 was modified, Withdrawal Order No. 3077162 was vacated, and the penalty was reduced to $125.
- Key point: An approved settlement can remove an S&S designation, vacate a related failure-to-abate order, and reduce the civil penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
ENERGY FUELS COAL V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19900313
TTEXT:
Page 2
~449
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC., CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
Docket No. WEST 89-247-R
v. Order No. 3077162; 4/26/89
SECRETARY OF LABOR, Southfield Mine
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH Mine I.D. 05-03455
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) Docket No. WEST 90-8
PETITIONER A.C. No. 05-03455-03575
v. Southfield Mine
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Phillip D. Barber, Esq., Welborn, Dufford, Brown &
Tooley, Denver, Colorado,
for Contestant/Respondent;
Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado,
for Petitioner/Respondent.
Before: Judge Lasher
The parties, at the prehearing conference held on-the-record
in Denver, Colorado on February 14, 1990, reached a settlement
fully resolving the issues in these two related (Penalty and
Contest) dockets. Penalty Docket WEST 90-8 contains two
enforcement documents, Citation No. 2875336 and a related Section
104(b) Order No. 3077162, which Order is also the subject of
Contest Proceeding WEST 89-247-R. Pursuant to their accord, the
parties agreed that the "Significant and Substantial" designation
on the Citation should be deleted and the $225 penalty originally
proposed by MSHA therefor should be reduced to $125 based on such
modification. As a further part of their settlement, the Section
104(b) (Failure to Abate) Order issued after Citation No. 2875336
is to be vacated. Based on such vacation, Contestant Energy Fuels
withdraws its contest in Docket WEST 89-247-R. The approval of
settlement issued from the bench (T. 14-18) is here affirmed.
Page 3
~450
ORDER
Citation No. 2875336 is MODIFIED to delete the "Significant
and Substantial" designation thereon and is otherwise affirmed.
Withdrawal Order No. 3077162 is VACATED.
Docket No. WEST 89-247-R, having been withdrawn, is
DISMISSED. Penalty Docket No. WEST 90-8, having been fully
resolved, is DISMISSED.
Respondent, if it has not previously done so, shall pay the
Secretary of Labor within 30 days from the date hereof the sum of
$125 as and for the civil penalty for Citation No. 2875336 above
assessed.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1990, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.