Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. (ALJ decision, March 13, 1990)
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 90-8 and WEST 89-247-R): Settlement approved and penalty reduced
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Energy Fuels Coal and the Secretary settled related contest and civil penalty proceedings involving the Southfield Mine. The settlement removed the significant-and-substantial designation from Citation No. 2875336 and reduced its proposed penalty from $225 to $125. Withdrawal Order No. 3077162 was vacated, and the company withdrew its contest. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved the settlement and dismissed both dockets.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provision: 30 U.S.C. § 814(b)
- Outcome: Citation No. 2875336 was modified, Withdrawal Order No. 3077162 was vacated, and the penalty was reduced to $125.
- Key point: An approved settlement can remove an S&S designation, vacate a related failure-to-abate order, and reduce the civil penalty.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
ENERGY FUELS COAL V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19900313
TTEXT:
Page 2
~449
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC.,
CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
Docket No. WEST 89-247-R
v. Order No. 3077162; 4/26/89
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Southfield Mine
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
Mine I.D. 05-03455
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
Docket No. WEST 90-8
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 05-03455-03575
v. Southfield Mine
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Phillip D. Barber, Esq., Welborn, Dufford, Brown & Tooley, Denver, Colorado, for Contestant/Respondent;
Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner/Respondent.
Before: Judge Lasher
The parties, at the prehearing conference held on-the-record in Denver, Colorado on February 14, 1990, reached a settlement fully resolving the issues in these two related (Penalty and Contest) dockets. Penalty Docket WEST 90-8 contains two enforcement documents, Citation No. 2875336 and a related Section 104(b) Order No. 3077162, which Order is also the subject of Contest Proceeding WEST 89-247-R. Pursuant to their accord, the parties agreed that the "Significant and Substantial" designation on the Citation should be deleted and the $225 penalty originally proposed by MSHA therefor should be reduced to $125 based on such modification. As a further part of their settlement, the Section 104(b) (Failure to Abate) Order issued after Citation No. 2875336 is to be vacated. Based on such vacation, Contestant Energy Fuels withdraws its contest in Docket WEST 89-247-R. The approval of settlement issued from the bench (T. 14-18) is here affirmed.
Page 3
~450
ORDER
Citation No. 2875336 is MODIFIED to delete the "Significant and Substantial" designation thereon and is otherwise affirmed.
Withdrawal Order No. 3077162 is VACATED.
Docket No. WEST 89-247-R, having been withdrawn, is DISMISSED. Penalty Docket No. WEST 90-8, having been fully resolved, is DISMISSED.
Respondent, if it has not previously done so, shall pay the Secretary of Labor within 30 days from the date hereof the sum of $125 as and for the civil penalty for Citation No. 2875336 above assessed.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace