Jet Concrete Incorporated (ALJ decision, July 25, 1991)
Jet Concrete Incorporated (FMSHRC WEST 90-273-M): Four settlement proceedings resolved for $3,037
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1991 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Jet Concrete and the Secretary reached a settlement covering four civil penalty proceedings and 38 citations. The parties agreed to reduce the assessments in three proceedings and settle the fourth for its stated total, resulting in payments of $802, $248, $1,740, and $247. Judge John J. Morris found the settlement reasonable and in the public interest. He approved it, affirmed the citations and penalties as provided in the agreement, and ordered Jet Concrete to pay $3,037 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: The decision does not identify individual standards. It cites the civil-penalty criteria in 30 U.S.C. § 820(i).
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the citations and settlement penalties were affirmed, and Jet Concrete was ordered to pay $3,037.
- Key point: A single approved settlement resolved four proceedings and 38 citations for a combined payment of $3,037.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. JET CONCRETE
DDATE:
19910725
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1185
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
The Federal Building
Room 280, 1244 Speer Boulevard
Denver, CO 80204
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 90-273-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 26-02153-05501
v.
Docket No. WEST 90-274-M
JET CONCRETE INCORPORATED,
A.C. No. 26-02153-05502
RESPONDENT
Docket No. WEST 90-347-M
A.C. No. 26-02153-05503
Docket No. WEST 91-6-M
A.C. No. 26-02153-05504
Jet Concrete Inc.
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Morris
These cases are civil penalty proceedings initiated by Petitioner against Respondent in accordance with the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801, et seq. The civil penalties sought here are for the violation of mandatory standards promulgated pursuant to the Act.
The parties reached an amicable settlement prior to a hearing.
In WEST 90-273-M, the parties seek to settle 20 citations with assessments of $1024 for the sum of $802.
In WEST 90-274-M, the parties seek to settle 7 citations for the assessments totaling $248.
In WEST 90-347-M, the parties seek to settle 10 citations with assessments of $3000 for the sum of $1740.
In WEST 91-6-M, the parties seek to settle 1 citation with an assessment of $400 for the sum of $247.
In connection with the motion, the parties have further submitted information relating to the statutory criteria for assessing civil penalties as contained in 30 U.S.C. 820(i).
I have reviewed the proposed settlement and I find it is reasonable and in the public interest. It should be approved.
Accordingly, I enter the following:
Page 3
~1186
ORDER
1. The settlement agreement is APPROVED.
2. The citations and penalties, as provided in the settlement agreement, are AFFIRMED.
3. Respondent is ORDERED TO PAY to the Secretary of Labor the sum of $3037 within 30 days of the date of this decision.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace