Wyoming Fuel Company (ALJ decision, March 13, 1990)
Wyoming Fuel Company (FMSHRC WEST 90-112-R, et al.): Certification request denied
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary asked Judge John J. Morris to certify an earlier ruling about whether an expedited hearing was required for enforcement orders. The judge denied certification and maintained his view that an expedited hearing is required when an order is issued under section 107 of the Mine Act. The order addressed procedure only and did not decide the underlying contests involving Wyoming Fuel's Golden Eagle Mine.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.52 and 2700.74; 30 U.S.C. § 817
- Outcome: The Secretary's request to certify the earlier ruling to the Commission was denied.
- Key point: A judge may deny certification of an interlocutory procedural ruling while the underlying contest proceedings continue.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
WYOMING FUEL V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19900313
TTEXT:
Page 2
~903
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
WYOMING FUEL COMPANY,
CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
CONTESTANT
Docket No. WEST 90-112-R
v. Order No. 2930784; 2/13/90
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Docket No. WEST 90-113-R
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
Citation No. 2930785; 2/13/90
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT
Docket No. WEST 90-114-R
Order No. 3241331; 2/16/90
Docket No. WEST 90-115-R
Citation No. 3241332; 2/16/90
Docket No. WEST 90-116-R
Citation No. 3241333; 2/16/90
Golden Eagle Mine
MSHA Mine ID No. 05-02820
ORDER
The Secretary has requested, pursuant to Rule 74, 29 C.F.R.
2700.74, that the judge certify his ruling of March 2, 1990 t the Commission.
The Secretary restates her previous position.
Discussion
The Secretary's request for certification is denied. As previously stated, the judge believes an expedited hearing is mandated when an order is issued under section 107.
In an unrelated case, Medicine Bow Coal Company, Docket Nos.
WEST 90-117-R and WEST 90-123-R, the judge concluded an expedited hearing was not mandated for a section 104(d) order unless the operator met certain criteria. A copy of the order in Medicine Bow is attached.
The judge believes the statute is clear. Further, Commission Rule 52, 29 C.F.R. 2700.52 does not address the issue.
Accordingly, the Secretary's motion is denied.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace