Bob Sherman, employed by Blackhawk (ALJ decision, September 4, 1990)
Bob Sherman, employed by Blackhawk (FMSHRC WEST 90-110-M): Settled citation affirmed with $25 penalty
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA alleged that Bob Sherman, employed by Blackhawk at the Evening Star Mine, violated a mandatory safety standard. The parties asked Judge John J. Morris to approve a settlement of Citation 3462951. The original proposed penalty was $250, and the settlement reduced it to $25 while affirming the citation. The judge found the settlement reasonable and in the public interest and ordered payment within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 57.6250
- Outcome: The citation was affirmed and the settled penalty was set at $25.
- Key point: The judge approved a settlement that reduced the proposed penalty from $250 to $25.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BOB SHERMAN
DDATE:
19900904
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1763
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 90-110-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 04-04663-05509
v. Evening Star Mine
BOB SHERMAN, EMPLOYED BY
BLACKHAWK,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Morris
This is a civil penalty proceeding initiated by the petitioner against respondent, in accordance with the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. The civil penalty sought here is for the violation of a mandatory standard promulgated pursuant to the Act.
Prior to a hearing, the parties filed a motion seeking approval of a proposed settlement.
Citation 3462951 alleges a violation of 30 C.F.R. 57,6250.
An original assessment of $250 was proposed. The parties now seek a decision affirming the citation and assessing a penalty of $25.
In support of their motion to approve the settlement, the parties have submitted information relating to the statutory criteria required for assessing civil penalties as contained in 30 U.S.C. 820(i).
I have reviewed the proposed settlement and I find it is reasonable and in the public interest. It should be approved.
Accordingly, I enter the following:
ORDER
1. Citation 3462951 and the amended civil penalty of $25 are AFFIRMED.
Page 3
~1764
2. Respondent is ordered to pay the sum of $25 within 30 days of the date of this decision.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace