Energy Fuels Coal, Inc.
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 89-291-R and WEST 89-449-A): Partial settlement approved for $79
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Energy Fuels Coal and the Secretary reached a partial settlement concerning Citation No. 3077180 at the Southfield Mine. Energy Fuels agreed to pay the proposed penalty of $79 in full and withdrew its contest. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved the settlement and dismissed Contest Docket No. WEST 89-291-R. Penalty Docket No. WEST 89-449-A remained open for the other citations.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): No substantive safety standard was stated in this settlement order.
- Outcome: The $79 penalty was approved, the contest docket was dismissed, and the related penalty docket remained pending.
- Key point: A partial settlement can resolve one citation while leaving the broader penalty proceeding open.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
ENERGY FUELS COAL V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19900313
TTEXT:
Page 2
~459
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC., CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
Docket No. WEST 89-291-R
v. Citation No. 3077180;5/11/89
SECRETARY OF LABOR, Southfield Mine
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH Mine I.D. 05-03455
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
RESPONDENT CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
Docket No. WEST 89-449-A
A.C. No. 05-03455-03569
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH Southfield Mine
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
PETITIONER
v.
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING PARTIAL SETTLEMENT
Appearances: Phillip D. Barber, Esq., Welborn, Dufford, Brown &
Tooley, Denver, Colorado,
for Contestant/Respondent;
Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado,
for Petitioner/Respondent.
Before: Judge Lasher
At the prehearing conference held on-the-record in Denver,
Colorado, on February 14, 1990, the parties reached various
settlement agreements involving some 18 enforcement documents
(Citations and Orders) which were the subject of both Contest and
Penalty proceedings. With respect to Citation No. 3077180 - one
of the 4 enforcement documents involved in Penalty Docket WEST
89-449-A - the parties settled the matter on the basis of
Respondent's agreement to pay in full ($79) MSHA's proposed
penalty and moved for approval of such agreement (T. 32). Such
motion was approved as was Energy Fuel's corollary motion to
withdraw its contest in Docket No. WEST 89-291-R (T. 32-33). Such
bench ruling is here affirmed.
Page 3
~460
ORDER
1. Contestant/Respondent Energy Fuels shall pay the
Secretary of Labor the sum of $79 as and for a civil penalty for
Citation No. 3077180.
2. Contest Docket No. WEST 89-291-R is DISMISSED.
3. Penalty Docket No. WEST 89-449-A will remain on the
Judge's docket pending resolution of the remaining Citations
contained therein.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1990, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.