Energy Fuels Coal, Inc.
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 89-28): Settlement modifies two enforcement documents
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Energy Fuels Coal, Inc. resolved three enforcement documents concerning its Southfield Mine through a settlement. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. removed the significant-and-substantial designation from one citation, affirmed another citation, and modified a withdrawal order into a section 104(a) citation. The total civil penalties assessed were $1,168, including a reduced $400 penalty for the modified order.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: The decision does not identify the individual regulatory standards in the release.
- Outcome: One citation was modified, one citation was affirmed, and one withdrawal order was modified into a section 104(a) citation. Total penalties were $1,168.
- Key point: The ALJ approved the parties' settlement and entered the agreed penalty and enforcement-document dispositions.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. ENERGY FUELS COAL
DDATE:
19891220
TTEXT:
Page 2
~2550
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 89-28
PETITIONER A.C. No. 05-03455-03562
v. Southfield Mine
ENERGY FUELS COAL, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado,
for Petitioner;
Phillip D. Barber, Esq., Welborn, Dufford, Brown
and Tooley, Denver, Colorado,
for Respondent.
Before: Judge Lasher
This proceeding was initiated by the filing of a petition
for assessment of penalties by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to
Section 110 of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30
U.S.C. Section 820 (1977) (herein the Act). At the commencement
of hearing a settlement was consummated and announced by the
parties resolving all three enforcement documents involved.
Pursuant to the agreement reached, Section 104(a) Citation No.
2873988 is to be modified to delete the "significant and
substantial" designation on the face thereof and Respondent is to
pay in full the initially-assessed penalty of $68; Section
104(d)(1) Citation No. 2873989 is to be affirmed and Respondent
is to pay in full the initially-assessed penalty of $700; and as
to the third enforcement document, Section 104(d)(1) Order No.
2873990, such is to be modified to a Section 104(a) Citation and
the penalty reduced from $800 to $400. The approval of the
settlement from the bench (T. 5-6) is here affirmed, the
settlement is found appropriate and supported in the record, and
the penalties agreed to by the parties are here assessed.
Page 3
~2551
ORDER
Citation No. 2873988 is modified to delete the "significant
and substantial" designation thereon.
Order No. 2873990 is modified to change its nature and
issuance authority from a Section 104(d)(1) Withdrawal Order to a
Section 104(a) Citation.
Respondent, if it has not previously done so, shall pay to
the Secretary of Labor within 30 days from the date of this
written decision the total penalties herein assessed of $1168.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1989, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.