Sierra Aggregate, Inc. (ALJ decision, April 30, 1990)

Sierra Aggregate, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 89-138-M and WEST 89-173-M): Settlement approved

Decision type

ALJ decision

Dockets

WEST 89-138-M, WEST 89-173-M

Decided

April 30, 1990

Presiding judge

John J. Morris

Outcome

Settled

Precedential status

Final order, not precedent

Checked against source

2026-08-16

Cited standards

30 C.F.R. § 56.4200(b)(2) 30 C.F.R. § 4200(b)(2) 30 U.S.C. § 819(a)

Official source

Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

PDF

View Official PDF

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent

This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.

Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.

Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Sierra Aggregate reached a settlement with the Secretary in two civil penalty proceedings. The stipulation amended several citations to non-S&S violations and reduced several proposed penalties. Judge John J. Morris found the settlement reasonable and in the public interest, approved it, affirmed the amended citations, and assessed a total penalty of $235. The company was ordered to pay within 40 days.

Decision snapshot

Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 56.4200(b)(2) and 4200(b)(2)
Outcome: The settlement was approved, the amended citations were affirmed, and $235 in penalties was assessed.
Key point: A settlement can reduce proposed penalties and change S&S allegations when the judge finds the agreed resolution reasonable and in the public interest.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
MSHA V. SIERRA AGGREGATE
DDATE:
19900430
TTEXT:

Page 2

~898

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION DENVER, COLORADO
April 30, 1990

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 89-138-M Petitioner A.C. No. 04-04707-05508

v. Docket No. WEST 89-173-M
A.C. No. 04-04707-05509
SIERRA AGGREGATE, INC.
Respondent Red Top Mine

DECISION

Appearances: Jonathan S. Vick, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Los Angeles, California for the Petitioner; Donald G. Jolly, President, Sierra Aggregate, Inc. for the Respondent.

Before: Judge Morris

The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), charges respondent with violating safety regulations promulgated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 801, et seq. (the Act).

After notice to the parties, a hearing on the merits commenced in Reno, Nevada on March 29, 1990.

At the hearing the parties reached an amicable settlement and entered into the following stipulation.

Docket No. WEST 89-138-M:

Citation No. 3286098: this citation should be affirmed as a non-S&S violation and the proposed penalty should be affirmed.

Citation No. 3286099: this citation should be affirmed as a non-S&S violation. Further, the proposed penalty of $105 should be reduced to a penalty of $20.

Citation No. 3293961: this citation should be amended to allege a non-S&S violation of 30 C.F.R. 4200(b)(2). Further, the proposed penalty should be affirmed.

Page 3

~899
Citation No. 3293962: this citation and the proposed penalty of $20 should be affirmed.

Citation No. 3293963: this citation should be amended to allege a non-S&S violation of 30 C.F.R. 56.4200 (B)(2) and the proposed penalty of $63 should be reduced to a penalty of $20.

Citation No. 3293964: this citation should be amended to allege a non-S&S violation and the proposed penalty should be reduced from $85 to $20.

Docket No. WEST 89-173-M:

Citation No. 3293966: this citation is amended to allege a non-S&S violation of section 109(a) of the Act and the penalty should be reduced from $50 to $20.

Citation No. 3286032: this citation should be affirmed as a non-S&S violation and the proposed penalty should be reduced from $126 to $20.

Citation No. 3286033: this citation should be affirmed and the proposed penalty reduced from $98 to $75.

I have reviewed the stipulation and I find it is reasonable. Further, it is in the public interest that the proposed settlement should be approved.

Accordingly, I enter the following:

ORDER

1. The stipulation and proposed settlement are approved.

2. The foregoing citations, as amended by the stipulation, are affirmed.

3. The following civil penalties are assessed:

Docket No. WEST 89-138-M:

Citation No.
Penalt@

3286098
$20
3286099
20
3293961
20
3293962
20
3293963
20
3293964
20

Page 4

~900
Docket No. WEST 89-173-M:

Citation No.
Penalty

3293966
$20
3286032
20
3286033
75

4. Respondent is ordered to pay to the Secretary the sum of $235.00 within 40 days of the date of this decision.

John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Jonathan S. Vick, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 3247 Federal Building, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012 (Certified Mail)

Mr. Donald G. Jolly, President, Sierra Aggregate Company, Inc., P.0. Box 1725, Bishop, CA 93514 (Certified Mail)

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
Chat, drafting and research in one workspace