FMC Wyoming Corporation (ALJ decision, May 18, 1988)
FMC Wyoming Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 88-5-DM): Discrimination proceeding dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1988 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Mary M. Ball asked to dismiss her discrimination proceeding against FMC Wyoming Corporation, the Secretary of Labor, and an MSHA district manager. Her motion followed a letter stating that MSHA would advise district managers to confirm that state agencies would keep miner complainants' names confidential before forwarding complaint correspondence. Judge James A. Broderick made the letter part of the record, granted the motion, and dismissed the proceeding.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in the release.
- Outcome: The discrimination proceeding was dismissed on the complainant's motion.
- Key point: The judge dismissed the case after MSHA addressed confidentiality procedures for miner complaint correspondence.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
MARY BALL V. FMC WYOMING, AND SOL (MSHA),
AND VERON GOMEZ
DDATE:
19880518
TTEXT:
Page 2
~678
FMSHRC-FCV
MAY 18, 1988
MARY M. BALL,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
Complainant
v. Docket No. WEST 88-5-DM
FMC WYOMING CORPORATION, FMC Trona Mine and
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), and
VERNON GOMEZ, DISTRICT
MANAGER, ROCKY MOUNTAIN
DISTRICT, MINE SAFETY
AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION,
Respondents
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Broderick
On May 16, 1988, Complainant filed a motion to dismiss this proceeding, based on a letter from counsel for MSHA to counsel for Complainant, stating that the Administrator for Metal and Non-metal Safety and Health, MSHA, would advise the District Managers that before complaint correspondence is forwarded to state agencies, the forwarding official should confirm that state agency will keep the names of miner complainants confidential. The letter above referred to is made part of the record in this case.
Premises considered, the motion is GRANTED, and this proceeding is DISMISSED.
James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
J. Davitt McAteer, Esq., Occupational S&H Law Ctr., 1536 16th St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (Certified Mail)
James Holtkamp, Esq., VanCott, Bagley, Cornwall & McCarthy, 50 S. Main, Suite 1600, Salt Lake City, UT 84145 (Certified Mail)
Thomas Mascolino, Esq., U.S. Department of Labor, Office of the Solicitor, 4015 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22203 (Certified Mail)
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace