McFarland & Hullinger (ALJ decision, February 22, 1989)

McFarland & Hullinger (FMSHRC WEST 88-328-M): Settlement approved after fatal dump-truck accident

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 88-328-M
Decided
February 22, 1989
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-17
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1989
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

McFarland & Hullinger faced three violations at the Kennecott Carr Fork operation. One remaining citation involved a dump truck left on a grade without its wheels blocked or turned into a bank or rib. The truck rolled, and driver Melvin Steward was fatally injured while trying to climb aboard. Judge Paul Merlin approved the settlement after the Solicitor provided additional information about the circumstances and reduced operator negligence, lowering the penalty for that violation from $1,000 to $800. The operator was ordered to pay $800 for the remaining violation and $300 for the two violations covered by the earlier partial settlement.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 57.9037
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, and the operator was ordered to pay $800 for the remaining violation plus $300 for the two earlier settled violations.
  • Key point: The ALJ approved a reduced penalty after receiving additional information supporting a lower degree of operator negligence.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL V. MCFARLAND & HULLINGER
DDATE:
19890222
TTEXT:


Page 2

~254

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
February 22, 1989

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 88-328-M
Petitioner A. C. No. 42-01153-05501

v. Kennecott Carr Fork

MCFARLAND & HULLINGER,
Respondent

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
ORDER TO PAY

Before: Judge Merlin

On December 22, 1988, the Solicitor submitted a motion to approve settlement of the three violations involved in this case. On January 13, 1989, I issued an order approving settlement for two of the violations, disapproved the settlement for the remaining violation and ordered the Solicitor to submit additional in formation for that violation. The Solicitor now has submitted an amended motion containing the required additional information.

The one citation remaining in this case was issued for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 57.9037 because a dump truck had been left on a grade with the parking brakes on, but the wheels neither blocked nor turned into a bank or rib. The truck started to roll and the driver was fatally injured as he attempted to climb aboard. The penalty was originally assessed at $1,000 and the proposed settlement is for $800. The Solicitor represents that the reduction is warranted because operator negligence is less than originally thought. The Solicitor advises in this respect as follows:

"Prehearing preparation had revealed that Melvin Steward, the decedent, had earlier in the day witnessed a highway accident which resulted in the death of an elderly gentleman who was killed when his camper ran a stop sign. This occurrence greatly disturbed and upset Mr. Steward. In fact, he not only telephoned his wife to relate his observations but decided to tell the shop lead man Ivan Zenger what he had witnessed. His idiosyncratic behavior in locking the truck brakes yet failing to lock the trailer brakes can only be explained by his agitated state of


Page 3

~255 mind. Secondly, it was disclosed that Mr. Zenger was not a shop foreman but a lead man who did not exercise any supervision, direct or indirect, over Mr. Steward."

I accept the foregoing representations, and based upon them I approve the recommended settlement.

Accordingly, the motion to approve settlement for this violation is GRANTED and the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $800 within 30 days from the date of this decision.

In the prior partial settlement approval, I approved settlements for the two other violations involved in this case. If it has not already done so, the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $300 for these violations within 30 days from the date of this decision.

Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Robert J. Murphy, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 1585 Federal Building, 1961 Stout Street, Denver, CO 80294 (Certified Mail)

Mr. Sidney K. Hullinger, McFarland & Hullinger, Box 238, Tooele, UT 84074 (Certified Mail)

Thomas Mascolino, Esq., Counsel, Trial Litigation, Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 414, Arlington, VA 22203 (Handcarried)

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace