Big Horn Calcium Company v. Secretary of Labor
Big Horn Calcium Company v. Secretary of Labor (FMSHRC WEST 88-203-M and related dockets): Settlement approved with $2,776 in penalties
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1989 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Big Horn Calcium Company resolved a group of contest and civil penalty proceedings involving its Warren Quarry and Mill. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved the settlement, which reduced the negligence designations for one citation and one order, vacated another citation for insufficient evidence, and dismissed the 11 contest proceedings. The company agreed to pay the assessed penalties, totaling $2,776. The settlement also specified that the company did not admit a Mine Act violation for unrelated judicial or administrative proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provisions: The settlement order does not identify a specific regulatory standard.
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, one citation was vacated, one citation and one order were modified, 11 contests were dismissed, and $2,776 in penalties was assessed.
- Key point: An ALJ may approve a negotiated resolution that changes enforcement classifications, vacates an unsupported citation, and resolves related contest proceedings.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
BIG HORN CALCIUM V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19890713
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1280
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.)
Office of Administrative Law Judges
BIG HORN CALCIUM COMPANY,
CONTESTANT
v.
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CONTEST PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 88-67-RM
RESPONDENT Citation No. 3065941; 12/5/87
Docket No. WEST 88-68-RM
Citation No. 3065942; 12/5/87
Docket No. WEST 88-69-RM
Citation No. 2648962; 12/9/87
Docket No. WEST 88-70-RM
Citation No. 2648963; 12/9/87
Docket No. WEST 88-71-RM
Citation No. 2648964; 12/10/87
Docket No. WEST 88-72-RM
Citation No. 2648965; 12/10/87
Docket No. WEST 88-73-RM
Citation No. 2648966; 12/10/87
Docket No. WEST 88-74-RM
Citation No. 2648967; 12/10/87
Docket No. WEST 88-75-RM
Citation No. 2648968; 12/10/87
Docket No. WEST 88-76-RM
Citation No. 2648970; 12/10/87
Docket No. WEST 88-78-RM
Citation No. 2648971; 12/10/87
Warren Quarry & Mill
Mine ID No. 24-00006
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 88-203-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 24-00006-05513
v. Docket No. WEST 88-204-M
A.C. No. 24-00006-05514
BIG HORN CALCIUM COMPANY,
RESPONDENT Docket No. WEST 88-205-M
A.C. No. 24-00006-05515
Page 3
(And Related Contest Dockets)
Warren Quarry & Mill
Page 4
~1281
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Lasher
Upon motion for approval of a proposed settlement of the 22
alleged violations in these 3 dockets and the same appearing
proper and in the full amount of the initial assessments for 21
of the 22 alleged violations, the settlement is approved.
As reflected in the caption, this matter resolves a total of
11 contest dockets and 3 related penalty dockets. The three
related penalty dockets involve a total of 22 enforcement
documents (Citations and Orders). The settlement disposes
completely of these 22 proposed penalty assessment as well as an
additional Citation which is the subject of Contest Docket No.
WEST 88-75-RM but which was not, apparently due to administrative
oversight, made the subject of a proposal for penalty, all of
which is reflected below. Big Horn Calcium Company, upon approval
of this settlement, agrees to withdraw its contest proceedings
herein.
1. Docket No. WEST 88-203-M
Proposed Related Contest
Citation No. Penalty Proceeding
2645747 $ 20.00
2645748 20.00
2645749 20.00
2645750 68.00
2645753 68.00
2645754 20.00
2645755 20.00
2645756 20.00
2645757 20.00
2645763 20.00 (88-70-RM)
2645764 20.00 (88-71-RM)
2645765 20.00 (88-72-RM)
2645766 20.00 (88-73-RM)
2645767 20.00 (88-74-RM)
Big Horn Calcium Company agrees to pay the above penalties
and such are here assessed.
2. Docket No. WEST 88-204-M
Proposed Related Contest
Citation No. Penalty Proceeding
3065941 $1,000.00 (88-67-RM)
Order No.
3065942 $1,000.00 (88-68-RM)
Citation No.
Page 5
2648962 300.00 (88-69-RM)
Page 6
~1282
(a) Pursuant to the agreement reached, Citation No. 3065941 is
modified from Section 104(d)(1) to Section 104(a) since pretrial
preparation disclosed that the violation was not the result of an
unwarrantable failure on the part of the mine operator. Likewise,
the negligence showing on the Citation is reduced from "reckless
disregard" to "high". The proposed penalty of $1,000.00 and the
designation of the violation as significant and substantial shall
remain unchanged.
(b) Order No. 3065942 is also modified from Section
104(d)(1) to Section 104(a). Again, pretrial preparation
disclosed that the violation was not the result of an
unwarrantable failure on the part of the operator and,
accordingly, the negligence shall also, as agreed, be reduced
from "reckless disregard" to "high". The proposed penalty of
$1,000.00 and the designation of the violation as significant and
substantial shall remain unchanged.
(c) Citation No. 2648962 and its $300 proposed penalty shall
remain unchanged.
(d) Big Horn Calcium Company agrees to withdraw its contest
to the citations and order as amended herein and to pay the
penalties above reflected. Such are here assessed.
3. Docket No. WEST 88-205-M
Proposed Related Contest
Citation No. Penalty Proceeding
2645752 $20.00
2645758 20.00
2645759 20.00
2648970 (Vacated) (20.00) (Withdrawn) (88-76-RM)
2648971 20.00 (88-78-RM)
(a) The Secretary having moved to vacate Citation No.
2648970 and to withdraw her proposed penalty therefor on the
basis of insufficient evidence, such motion is approved and
Citation No. 2648970 is VACATED.
(b) Big Horn Calcium Company agrees to withdraw its contest
to the other four (4) citations in Docket No. WEST 88-205-M and
to pay the above penalties which are here assessed.
4. Docket No. WEST 88-75-RM
A civil penalty proceeding was never filed by MSHA with
respect to this Citation (No. 2648968). While a civil penalty has
not been proposed, the parties agree that a $20.00 penalty is
Page 7
~1283
appropriate. This agreement is approved as part of this overall
settlement. Big Horn Calcium Company agrees to withdraw its
contest to Citation No. 2648968 and to pay the agreed penalty
which is here assessed.
In consenting to this settlement agreement, the parties have
agreed (1) that nothing therein shall be deemed an admission by
Big Horn Calcium Company of a violation of the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act, or regulation or standard thereof, in any
judicial or administration forum other than an action brought by
the United States Government under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act, and (2) that by entering this settlement agreement,
Big Horn Calcium Company does not admit to a violation of the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, or regulation or standard
thereof, for the purpose of any judicial or administrative
proceeding which directly or indirectly concerns the civil or
criminal liability of any or all directors, officers and agents
of Big Horn Calcium Company regarding the subject matter,
allegations and issues related to Citation No. 3065941 and Order
No. 3069542 [Docket No. WEST 88-204-M].
In the premises, the amicable resolution reached by the
parties appears appropriate and is approved with the parties to
bear their own fees and expenses.
ORDER
1. Citation No. 2648970 is VACATED.
2. Citation No. 3065941 and Order No. 3065942 are MODIFIED
as specified hereinabove.
3. The 11 Contest proceedings listed in the Caption are,
based on this approval of settlement, DISMISSED.
4. Big Horn Calcium Company, if it has not previously done
so, is ordered to pay to the Secretary of Labor within 30 days
from the date hereof the sum of $2,776.00 as and for the civil
penalties hereinabove assessed.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1989, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.