Colorado Westmoreland Incorporated (ALJ decision, November 30, 1987)
Colorado Westmoreland Incorporated (FMSHRC WEST 87-219): Citation and penalty vacated
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA issued Colorado Westmoreland an order, later modified to a citation, for allowing combustible material to accumulate in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.400. The operator cleaned up the material based on its understanding of MSHA's requirements. Because the operator relied on that understanding, the Secretary asked to vacate the citation and proposed penalty. Judge August F. Cetti granted the motion, vacated both, and dismissed the proceeding.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.400
- Outcome: The citation and proposed penalty were vacated, and the proceeding was dismissed.
- Key point: The Secretary may seek vacatur when the operator corrected the condition based on its understanding of the agency's requirements.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. COLORADO WESTMORELAND
DDATE:
19871130
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1987
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 87-219
PETITIONER A.C. No. 05-04184-03504 v.
COLORADO WESTMORELAND
Orchard Valley West Mine
INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENT
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE CITATION AND PROPOSAL FOR PENALTY AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Cetti
On March 19, 1987, respondent was issued an order (later modified to a citation) for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.400. That standard required combustible materials be cleaned up and not permitted to accumulate. Respondent cleaned up the combustible material based on its understanding of what was acceptable to MSHA.
Because of respondent's reliance on its understanding of MSHA's requirements, petitioner moves that the citation and proposed penalty be vacated.
Good cause having been shown, petitioner's motion that the citation and the proposed penalty be vacated is granted and this proceeding is dismissed.
August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace