Colorado Westmoreland Incorporated (ALJ decision, November 30, 1987)

Colorado Westmoreland Incorporated (FMSHRC WEST 87-219): Citation and penalty vacated

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 87-219
Decided
November 30, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations vacated
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-20
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not binding on the Commission in other cases. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA issued Colorado Westmoreland an order, later modified to a citation, for allowing combustible material to accumulate in violation of 30 C.F.R. § 75.400. The operator cleaned up the material based on its understanding of MSHA's requirements. Because the operator relied on that understanding, the Secretary asked to vacate the citation and proposed penalty. Judge August F. Cetti granted the motion, vacated both, and dismissed the proceeding.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 75.400
  • Outcome: The citation and proposed penalty were vacated, and the proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: The Secretary may seek vacatur when the operator corrected the condition based on its understanding of the agency's requirements.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. COLORADO WESTMORELAND
DDATE:
19871130
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1987

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 87-219
PETITIONER A.C. No. 05-04184-03504 v.
COLORADO WESTMORELAND
Orchard Valley West Mine
INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENT

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO VACATE CITATION AND PROPOSAL FOR PENALTY AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before: Judge Cetti

On March 19, 1987, respondent was issued an order (later modified to a citation) for a violation of 30 C.F.R. 75.400. That standard required combustible materials be cleaned up and not permitted to accumulate. Respondent cleaned up the combustible material based on its understanding of what was acceptable to MSHA.

Because of respondent's reliance on its understanding of MSHA's requirements, petitioner moves that the citation and proposed penalty be vacated.

Good cause having been shown, petitioner's motion that the citation and the proposed penalty be vacated is granted and this proceeding is dismissed.

August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace