FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket WEST 87-129-M Decided September 8, 1987 Mixed result Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr.

Neil Sprague

Neil Sprague (FMSHRC WEST 87-129-M): Settlement approved, citation affirmed, and withdrawal order vacated

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA cited Neil Sprague for failing to provide an elevated haulage road at the Trupp Quarry and later issued a withdrawal order because the berm was not built within the allowed time. The parties settled after preparation for hearing showed that adverse weather had caused the delay. Judge Michael A. Lasher approved the settlement, vacated the withdrawal order, affirmed the citation, and reduced the proposed penalty from $195 to $30. The judge also noted that Sprague was a small operator with three violations in the preceding 24-month period.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): The release does not identify a numbered safety standard.
  • Outcome: The withdrawal order was vacated, the citation was affirmed, and a $30 civil penalty was ordered.
  • Key point: A settlement may resolve an abatement dispute by vacating a withdrawal order while leaving the underlying citation in place at a reduced penalty.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

           Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
                 Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 87-129-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 05-02666-05504

          v.                        Trupp Quarry

NEIL SPRAGUE,
RESPONDENT

                       DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Lasher

 Citation No. 2638675 was issued on December 1, 1986, for

Respondent's failure to provide for an elevated haulage road. On
January 28, 1987, a Section 104(b) Withdrawal Order (Failure to
Abate Order No. 2637460) was issued since the Respondent failed
to provide the berm within the time period provided in the
Citation and its extension. In issuing the Withdrawal Order, the
Inspector noted that the Order was written to "replace" the
Citation "which was not complied with."

 In the parties' joint motion for approval of the settlement,

the Petitioner moved to vacate the Order since preparation for
the hearing "revealed that the failure to build a berm was caused
by adverse weather conditions." As part of the settlement the
administrative penalty originally sought by MSHA was reduced from
$195 to $30. The reduction appears justified in view of the
inference to be drawn from the fact that the Withdrawal Order has
been withdrawn. I conclude that this reflects a change in
Petitioner's initial belief that Respondent did not proceed in
good faith to promptly abate the violation after notification
thereof. It also appears that this is a small operator (8800
hours worked per year) who had a record of but 3 violations in the preceding 24Ämonth period.

    In the premises, the settlement is approved.

                                   ORDER

    1. Withdrawal Order No. 2637460 is vacated.

    2. Citation No. 2638675 is affirmed.

    3. Respondent, if it has not previously done so, shall pay the
    Secretary of Labor within 30 days from the date of this decision
    the sum of $30.00 as and for the civil penalty for the violation
    described in Citation No. 2638675.


                              Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
                              Administrative Law Judge

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1987, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.