Peabody Coal Company (ALJ decision, August 17, 1987)

Peabody Coal Company (FMSHRC WEST 87-113-R): Citation modified through settlement and contest dismissed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 87-113-R
Decided
August 17, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision approving a settlement, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Peabody Coal Company contested the significant and substantial and unwarrantable-failure allegations in Citation No. 2830921 at the Black Mesa Mine. The parties agreed to remove the unwarrantable-failure designation, remove the significant-and-substantial designation, reduce the charged negligence from high to moderate, and resolve the matter with a $50 administrative penalty. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. ordered the agreed citation changes, approved Peabody's withdrawal of its contest, ordered payment of the $50 penalty, and dismissed the proceeding.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 814(d)(1); 30 U.S.C. § 814(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
  • Outcome: The citation was modified by agreement, Peabody's contest was withdrawn, a $50 penalty was ordered paid, and the proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: The settlement removed the heightened enforcement allegations and reduced the negligence designation while resolving the contest for a $50 penalty.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
PEABODY COAL V. SOL (MSHA)
DDATE:
19870817
TTEXT:


Page 2

~1466

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

PEABODY COAL COMPANY,
CONTEST PROCEEDING
CONTESTANT
Docket No. WEST 87-113-R
v. Citation No. 2830921; 2/11/87

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Black Mesa Mine
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

DECISION

Before: Judge Lasher

The Contestant, Peabody Coal Company, in its Notice of Contest filed herein on March 9, 1987, contested the so-called \"significant and substantial\" and \"unwarrantable failure\" allegations of the subject Citation No. 2830921, which was issued under Section 104(d)(1) of the 1977 Mine Act.

Pursuant to agreement reached by the parties, Contestant agrees to pay a reduced, administrative penalty (no penalty proposal has been filed with this Commission) of $50.00 and withdraw its Notice of Contest in return for Respondent MSHA's agreement to the modification of the Citation in the following respects:

(a) Deletion of the "unwarrantable failure" nature of the Citation by striking, in line 12 of the Citation, the authority shown for its issuance, "104(d)(1)," and substituting therefor "104(a);

(b) Deletion of the "Significant and Substantial" designation shown on line 10C of the Citation;
(c) Changing the degree of negligence (charged at line 11 of the Citation) from "High" to "Moderate".

Respondent agreeing to the above-specified modifications of the Citations, they are so ordered; to effectuate the settlement reached and the prompt and amicable resolution of this matter, and as requested by the parties, the Contestant, Peabody Coal Company, shall forthwith pay MSHA in accordance with its agreement and established procedures a penalty of $50.00; Contestant's withdrawal of its Notice of Contest is approved (29 C.F.R. 2700.11) and this proceeding is dismissed.

Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace