Sanders Construction, Inc.
Sanders Construction, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 86-86-M): Four citations affirmed and one vacated
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Sanders Construction, Inc. faced five citations at the Gilbert Mine #1 in connection with violations of mandatory mine-safety standards. After a hearing began, the parties reached a settlement. Judge John J. Morris approved the settlement, affirmed four citations under 30 C.F.R. §§ 56.6047 and 56.6090 with $2,000 in total penalties, and vacated Citation 2361175 under 30 C.F.R. § 56.18020. The company was ordered to pay $2,000 within 40 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 56.6047, 56.6090, and 56.18020
- Outcome: Four citations were affirmed with $2,000 in penalties, and one citation was vacated.
- Key point: The ALJ approved a settlement that preserved four penalties and vacated one citation.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. SANDERS
DDATE:
19861031
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1618
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 86-86-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 42-01927-05502 15J
v. Gilbert Mine #1
SANDERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Appearances: Margaret Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado,
for Petitioner.
Before: Judge Morris
This is a civil penalty proceeding initiated by petitioner
against respondent in accordance with the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. The civil penalties
sought here are for the violation of mandatory standards
promulgated pursuant to the Act.
After notice to the parties, a hearing on the merits
commenced in Las Vegas, Nevada on August 26, 1986. At the hearing
counsel for the petitioner advised the judge that the parties had
reached an amicable settlement.
The citations, the standards alleged violated, the original
assessments and the proposed dispositions are as follows:
Standard Original
Citation No. C.F.R. Title 30 Assessment Disposition
2361156 56.6047 $500 $500
2361157 56.6047 500 500
2361159 56.6090 500 500
2361171 56.6047 500 500
2361175 56.18020 500 Vacate
I have considered the proposed settlement and I find it is
reasonable and in the public interest.
Accordingly, I enter the following:
Page 3
~1619
ORDER
1. The settlement is approved.
2. The following citations and proposed penalties are
affirmed:
Citation No. Penalty
2361156 $500
2361157 500
2361159 500
2361171 500
3. Citation 2361175 and all penalties therefor are vacated.
4. Respondent is ordered to pay the sum of $2,000 within 40
days of the date of this decision.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1986, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.