Volcanite Limited (ALJ decision, July 25, 1986)
Volcanite Limited (FMSHRC WEST 86-78-M): Pit berm and bank settlement approved for $865
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA cited Volcanite Limited for low berms and an excessively high pit bank at its Puuwaawaa Pit and Mill. A dozer operator had died after driving over the pit edge, but the settlement materials indicated that he had suffered a stroke while driving and that the bank height did not cause the accident. The Secretary also reported insufficient evidence to attribute the accident to the berm height, while maintaining that both violations were serious. Chief Judge Paul Merlin accepted the proposed reduction from $1,300 to $865 and approved the settlement. He ordered Volcanite to pay $865 within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 55.9022 and 55.3003, pit berm and bank conditions.
- Outcome: Settlement approved for two violations; $865 due within 30 days.
- Key point: The penalty was reduced after the submitted materials changed the assessment of whether the cited conditions caused the fatal accident.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1730 K STREET NW, 6TH FLOOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
July 25, 1986
SECRETARY OF LABOR, : CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
:
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), : Docket No. WEST 86-78-M
Petitioner : A. C. No:51-00086-05501
:
v. : Puuwaawaa Pit & Mill
:
VOLCANITE LIMITED,
:
Respondent
:
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
.Before: Judge Merlin
The Solicitor has filed for approval a settlement agreement for the two violations involved in this matter. The original assessed penalties were $1,300 and the proposed settlements are $865.
Citation No. 2086735 was issued for violation of 30 C.F.R.
S 55.9022 because the berms on the east side of the operator's pit bank were not built high enough to prevent rubber-tired equip- ment from qoing over the edge. Citation No. 2086736 was issued for violation of 30 C.F.R. § 55.3003 because of the excessive height of the east bank of the pit. The original assessments were based upon the fact that a dozer operator had been killed after driving off the edge of the pit. However, it now appears from the materials filed that the dozer operator had a. stroke while driving the dozer and that this was the cause of the accident. Indeed, the Solicitor advises that there was no relationship between the height of the bank and the accident. The Solicitor further states that there is insufEicient evidence to attribute the accident to the inadequate height of the berms. However, violations did exist and they were serious. Based upon the foregoing circumstances the proposed reduction for Citation No. 2086735 is from $1,000 to $665. The proposed reduction for Citation No. 2086736 is from $300 to $200. Finally, the Solicitor sets forth that the operator has no previous history of violations and is very small, having only 197 man-hours of production per year.
The representations of the Solicitor are accepted.
1127
Accordinglyr the settlement agreements are APPROVED and the operator is ORDERED TO PAY $865 within 30 days of the date of this decision.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
Distribution:
Marshall P. Salzman, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U. S. Depart- ment of Labor, P. 0. Box 36014, San Francisco, CA 94012 (Certified Mail) Michael M. Payne, Esq., Grosvenor Center, Mauka Tower, 737 Bishop Street, Suite 2020, Honolulu, HI 96813 (Certified Mail)
/gl
1128
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace