Secretary of Labor v. Cobblestone, Ltd. (ALJ decision, June 20, 1986)
Secretary of Labor v. Cobblestone, Ltd. (FMSHRC WEST 86-52-M): Twenty citations settled for $360
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Cobblestone, Ltd. and the Secretary reached a settlement over 20 citations at the Cobblestone Pit Mine. The Secretary sought to withdraw two citations because of insufficient evidence. The parties agreed that each of the remaining 18 citations would carry a $20 penalty and that any originally classified as significant and substantial would be reclassified as non-significant and substantial. Judge John A. Carlson approved the agreement and vacated the two withdrawn citations. He assessed $360 for the other 18 citations, payable within 50 days. The decision does not identify the underlying safety standards.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: No specific safety standard is identified in this settlement decision.
- Outcome: Two citations vacated and 18 settled at $20 each, for a $360 total penalty.
- Key point: The settlement removed two unsupported citations and reclassified any significant and substantial findings on the remaining citations.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. COBBLESTONE
DDATE:
19860620
TTEXT:
~984
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 86-52-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 05-03950-05501
v. Cobblestone Pit Mine
COBBLESTONE, LTD.,
RESPONDENT
DECISION
Appearances: James H. Barkley, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner;
Respondent was absent.
Before: Judge Carlson
This civil penalty proceeding came regularly on for hearing at Grand Junction, Colorado on May 2, 1986. At the outset of the hearing, counsel for the Secretary of Labor announced that he had reached a settlement with the respondent on the previous evening which, if approved, would resolve all matters in dispute. He also announced that respondent's representative had elected not to attend the hearing in view of the settlement, but had authorized him to recite the substance of the agreement for the record. Mr. Lloyd, respondent's representative, has since confirmed the particulars of the agreement by letter.
The terms of the settlement are as follows:
The Secretary moves to withdraw citations 2376695 and 2376699 for lack of sufficient evidence.
Of the remaining 18 citations, the penalties for all are to be $20.00 and those which were originally classified as "significant and substantial" are to be classified as "non-significant and substantial."
Based upon the representations of the Secretary at the hearing and the contents of the file, I conclude that the settlement agreement should be approved in all respects.
~985
Accordingly, the settlement provisions set forth above are ORDERED approved. Citations 2376695 and 2376699 are vacated. A total civil penalty of $360.00 is assessed for the remaining 18 citations, which sum shall be paid within 50 days of the date of this decision.
John A. Carlson
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace