Vinnell Mining and Minerals Corporation

Plain-English summary

Vinnell Mining and Minerals faced four citations at the Oro Grande Mine with initial assessments totaling $241. Judge August F. Cetti approved the settlement after reviewing the statutory penalty criteria and the parties' explanation for reducing two assessments. The settlement reduced the total to $175, and payment would dismiss the proceeding.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standards: 30 C.F.R. §§ 56.5001(a)(5), 56.14001, and 56.11001
• Outcome: The settlement was approved for $175 total.
• Key point: A settlement supported by the penalty criteria and an explanation for reductions may be approved as reasonable and in the public interest.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. VINNELL MINING
DDATE:
19870603
TTEXT:

Page 2

~1046

           Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
                 Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 86-260-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 04-03008-05511

      v.                                Oro Grande Mine

VINNELL MINING AND MINERALS
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT

                    DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Cetti

                         Statement of the Case

 This is a civil penalty proceeding filed by the petitioner

against the respondent pursuant ot Section 110(a) of the Federal
Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 820(a), seeking
civil penalty assessments in the amount of $241 for four alleged
violations of certain mandatory safety standards found in Title
30, Code of Federal Regulations.

 The parties have submitted a motion pursuant to Commission

Rule 30, 29 C.F.R. 2700.30, seeking approval of a settlement of
the case. The citations, initial assessments, and the proposed
settlement amounts are as follows:

                              CFR Title 30

Citation No. Date Section Assessment Settlement

2364566 12/11/84 56.5001A/5 $ 20.00 $ 20.00
2364567 12/11/84 56.5001A/5 105.00 105.00
2671590 7/2/86 56.14001 58.00 30.00
2671591 7/2/86 56.11001 58.00 20.00

                               Totals          $241.00             $175.00

                               Discussion

 In support of the proposed settlement disposition of this

case, the petitioner has submitted information pertaining to the
six statutory civil penalty criteria found in Section 110(i) of
the Act. In addition, the petitioner has submitted a discussion
and disclosure as to the facts and circumstances surrounding the
issuance of the citations in question, and a reasonable
justification for the reduction of two of the original proposed
civil penalty assessments.

Page 3

~1047
Conclusion

 After careful review and consideration of the pleadings,

arguments, and submissions in support of the motion to approve
the proposed settlement of this case, I conclude and find that
the proposed settlement disposition is reasonable, appropriate,
and in the public interest. Accordingly, pursuant to 29 C.F.R.
2700.30, the motion is GRANTED, and the settlement IS APPROVED.

                             ORDER

 Respondent IS ORDERED to pay civil penalties in the

settlement amounts shown above totaling $175.00 in satisfaction
of the citations in question within thirty (30) days of the date
of this decision and order, and upon receipt of payment by the
petitioner, this proceeding is dismissed.

                                     August F. Cetti
                                     Administrative Law Judge