Emery Mining Corporation; Utah Power & Light Company (ALJ decision, March 27, 1990)
Emery Mining Corporation; Utah Power & Light Company (FMSHRC WEST 86-240, WEST 86-243, and WEST 86-257): Civil penalty proceedings dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1990 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary of Labor asked to withdraw the civil penalty requests against Emery Mining Corporation and Utah Power & Light Company after the Tenth Circuit vacated the underlying citations. Judge John J. Morris granted the motions and dismissed the three proceedings. The order also directed that a copy of the court's decision be attached for review by Mine Act practitioners.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None stated in the order.
- Outcome: The Secretary's motions were granted and the three civil penalty proceedings were dismissed.
- Key point: When the underlying citations had been vacated by the court, the judge dismissed the pending penalty proceedings for good cause.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. EMERY MINING
DDATE:
19900327
TTEXT:
Page 2
~572
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (F.M.S.H.R.C.) Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 86-240
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 42-00121-03610
Deer Creek Mine v.
Docket No. WEST 86-243
EMERY MINING CORPORATION;
A.C. No. 42-01944-03514
UTAH POWER & LIGHT COMPANY,
Cottonwood Mine
RESPONDENT
Docket No. WEST 86-257
A.C. No. 42-00080-03570
Wilberg Mine
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before: Judge Morris
The Secretary has moved to withdraw her request for civil penalties herein.
As a grounds therefor the Secretary states the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated the citations herein.
The Secretary further notes that the Circuit Court's decision clarifies a point of Mine Act interpretation.
Accordingly, the Secretary requests that the Court's decision be
attached to this order of dismissal so the decision may be
readily reviewed by Mine Act practitioners.
For the foregoing reasons the following order is appropriate:
ORDER
For good cause shown, the Secretary's motions are GRANTED and the cases herein are dismissed.
Further, a copy of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision is attached to this order of dismissal.
John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace