Secretary of Labor o/b/o Gabossi v. Western Fuels-Utah, Inc. (Commission decision, February 2, 1989)
Secretary of Labor o/b/o Gabossi v. Western Fuels-Utah, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 86-24-D): Settlement approved and case dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1989, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
After the Commission reversed an earlier ruling and remanded the case, Judge John J. Morris found that Western Fuels-Utah had discriminatorily discharged Joseph Gabossi and ordered $39,560.06 in back pay and other expenses with interest. After further review proceedings, the parties submitted a signed settlement agreement and asked the Commission to approve it and dismiss the case. The Commission approved the settlement, vacated its direction for review, and dismissed the proceeding. The order does not state the settlement's revised payment terms.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1)
- Outcome: The settlement was approved, the direction for review was vacated, and the proceeding was dismissed.
- Key point: The Commission may resolve a remanded discrimination proceeding by approving a signed settlement and dismissing the case.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
MSHA (JOSEPH GABOSSI) V. WESTERN FUELS-UTAH DDATE: 19890202 TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY & HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
February 2, 1989
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
on behalf of JOSEPH GABOSSI
v. Docket No. WEST 86-24-D
WESTERN FUELS-UTAH, INC.
BEFORE: Ford, Chairman; Backley, Doyle, Lastowka and Nelson, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
In this discrimination case arising under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. $ 801 et seq. (1982), the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
The Commission issued its prior decision on the merits in this matter on August 15, 1988, reversing Commission Administrative Law Judge John J. Morris' original decision and remanding the case to him for further proceedings. 10 FMSHRC 953 (August 1988). In his Decision After Remand issued on October 24, 1988, Judge Morris concluded that complainant Joseph Gabossi had been discharged in violation of section 105(c)(1) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. $ 815(c)(1), and ordered Western Fuels-Utah, Inc. ("Western Fuels") to pay Mr. Gabossi $39,560.06 in back pay and other expenses with interest. 10 FMSHRC 1462 (October 1988)(ALJ). (Gabossi had not sought reinstatement.) Western Fuels filed a petition for discretionary review, which the Commission granted in part and denied in part on December 2, 1988.
Page 2
Western Fuels subsequently filed with the Commission a motion indicating that the parties had reached a settlement of the case and would be submitting a motion for approval of settlement and dismissal. On January 11, 1989, the Commission issued an order staying briefing and directing the parties to file their motion by January 31, 1989. The Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismiss was received by the Commission on January 27, 1989. Attached to the parties' joint motion
Page 3
~135
is a copy of the settlement agreement signed by the parties and by Gabossi.
Upon consideration of the settlement agreement, motion, and record, we approve the settlement and grant the motion to dismiss. Accordingly, our direction for review is vacated and this proceeding is dismissed.
Ford B. Ford, Chairman
Richard V. Backley, Commissioner
Joyce A. Doyle, Commissioner
James A. Lastowka, Commissioner
L. Clair Nelson, Commissioner
Distribution
Jerald S. Feingold, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
4015 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA 22203
Richard S. Mandelson, Esq.
Baker & Hostetler
303 East 17th Avenue, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80203
Administrative Law Judge John Morris
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission 1244 Speer Blvd., Room 280 Denver, Colorado 80204
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace