Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation (ALJ decision, June 8, 1987)
Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 86-198-DM): Discrimination case dismissed with prejudice
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The discrimination proceeding was brought by Henry C. Stairs, who died without a surviving spouse. The known next of kin did not appoint a personal representative or indicate interest in doing so after receiving notice that the case would be dismissed if no representative appeared. Judge August F. Cetti dismissed the case with prejudice for good cause.
Decision snapshot
- Cited provisions: None stated in this order.
- Outcome: The discrimination proceeding was dismissed with prejudice.
- Key point: A pending discrimination case may be dismissed when the complainant dies and no personal representative comes forward after notice.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
HENRY STAIRS V. COEUR ALENE
DDATE:
19870608
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1078
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
HENRY C. STAIRS,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. WEST 86-198-DM v.
MD 86-34
COEUR d'ALENE MINES
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE
Complainant Henry C. Stairs died July 10, 1986, leaving no surviving spouse. Although the known next of kin have been contacted, no one has been appointed to serve as Personal Representative of the Complainant's estate or indicated any interest in such an appointment.
Finally, on May 12, 1987, a Notice that the case would be dismissed with prejudice unless a Personal Representative was appointed and made an appearance in this matter within 20 days was sent by certified mail to all known next of kin. There has been no response to the Notice of intention. Under the circumstances Coeur d'Alene Mines Corporation is entitled to an order dismissing the case with prejudice.
ORDER
Good cause having been shown it is ORDERED that the above captioned case be and it hereby is dismissed with prejudice.
August F. Cetti
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace