Gilbert Industrial (ALJ decision, February 4, 1987)

Gilbert Industrial (FMSHRC WEST 85-77-DM): Discrimination complaint dismissed after settlement

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 85-77-DM
Decided
February 4, 1987
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-22
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision approving a settlement, not Commission precedent
This order became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Dan L. Thompson asked to withdraw his discrimination complaint against Gilbert Industrial after the parties reached a settlement. Judge Gary Melick granted permission to withdraw the complaint and dismissed the case. The specific settlement terms were sealed and could be reviewed only by order of the Commission, a Commission judge, or a court with jurisdiction.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11
  • Outcome: The withdrawal was approved, the discrimination case was dismissed, and the settlement terms were sealed.
  • Key point: A settled discrimination complaint may be withdrawn and dismissed while the specific settlement terms remain sealed.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

DAN L. THOMPSON,
DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
COMPLAINANT
Docket No. WEST 85-77-DM
v. MSHA Case No. MD 82-27

GILBERT INDUSTRIAL,
Cyprus Thompson Creek Project
RESPONDENT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Complainant, Dan L. Thompson, requests approval to withdraw his Complaint in the captioned case on the grounds that a mutually agreeable settlement of the underlying controversy has been reached. Under the circumstances herein, permission to withdraw is granted. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.11. The case is therefore dismissed. At the request of the parties the specific terms of the settlement agreement are hereby sealed subject to review only by order of the Commission, a Commission judge, or Court having jurisdiction.
Gary Melick
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace