Brubaker-Mann Incorporated

Plain-English summary

Brubaker-Mann Incorporated operated a small business subject to the Mine Act. An inspector found two pieces of lumber within six feet of a powder magazine and several hundred railroad ties within 20 feet. Judge John J. Morris found that the railroad ties were unnecessary combustible material under 30 C.F.R. § 56.6005 and affirmed the citation. He found minimal gravity, no adverse proven violation history, and good-faith abatement. The judge reduced the proposed $20 penalty to $15.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.6005
• Outcome: Citation No. 2364576 was affirmed, and the civil penalty was reduced to $15.
• Key point: Combustible materials near a powder magazine violate the clearance requirement even when an explosion is unlikely.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. BRUBAKER-MANN
DDATE:
19861009
TTEXT:

Page 2

~1530

       Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
             Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 85-157-M
PETITIONER A.C. No. 04-00030-05503

      v.                               BrubakerÄMann

BRUBAKERÄMANN INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENT

                          AMENDED DECISION

Appearances: Rochelle Ramsey, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, Los Angeles, California,
for Petitioner;
Steve Pell, Esq., Ventura, California,
for Respondent.

Before: Judge Morris

 The Secretary of Labor, on behalf of the Mine Safety and

Health Administration, (MSHA), charges respondent with violating a
safety regulation promulgated under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq., (the Act).

 After notice to the parties a hearing on the merits

commenced in Los Angeles, California on June 11, 1986.

The parties filed post-trial briefs.

                              Issues

 Certain threshold issues were discussed and ruled contrary

to respondent's contentions in WEST 84Ä96ÄM.

                           Stipulation

 The parties stipulated that respondent is a small operator.

Further, respondent is subject to the Act unless MSHA's
jurisdiction is pre-empted by the California Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (Tr. 191, 249).

                          Citation 2364576

 This citation charges respondent with violating 30 C.F.R.

56.6005 which provides as follows:

 56.6005 Areas around storage facilities.
Areas surrounding magazines and facilities for the storage

Page 3

~1531
of blasting agents shall be kept clear of rubbish, brush, dry
grass, or trees (other than live trees 10 or more feet tall), for
a distance not less than 25 feet in all directions, and other
unnecessary combustible materials for a distance of not less than
50 feet.

                   Summary of the Evidence

 MSHA Inspector Ronald Ainge issued this citation when he

found two pieces of lumber within six feet of a power magazine.
In addition, there were railroad ties within 20 feet of the
magazine (Tr. 58, 129). In the inspector's opinion several
hundred railroad ties are unnecessary for a mining operation (Tr.
125, 126). However, there were loading docks in the area (Tr.
126).

 The railroad ties were higher than the nearby rock pile (Tr.

124).

 While the inspector considered that an accident was unlikely

he believed a fire could involve the powder magazine with a
resulting explosion (Tr. 58, 125).

 Powder magazines also fall under the jurisdiction of other

federal, state and county authorities (Tr. 127, 128, 215).

 Mr. Mann testified that the area met the requirements of the

federal firearm and explosives representatives (Tr. 243, 244).
These authorities required the company to install a stone berm
approximately 10 feet high and the company complied (Tr. 244).

                  Evaluation of the Evidence

 The facts establish a violation of the regulation. There

were two pieces of timber and several hundred railroad ties
within 20 feet of the powder magazine. I concur with the
inspector's view that such a large number of ties constitute
"unnecessary combustible material" as prohibited by the
regulation.

 Concerning Mr. Mann's testimony: I accept his statements

that other federal authorities required a stone berm. But I do
not find it credible that they would also require railroad ties
in such close proximity to the magazine.

Citation 2364576 should be affirmed.

                        Civil Penalty

 The statutory mandate to assess civil penalties is contained

in section 110(i) of the Act, now codified 30 U.S.C. 820(i).
Concerning prior history: the computer printout (Ex. P34) shows
that respondent had no violations in the two-year period ending
March 5, 1985. The printout shows two violations before March 6,
1983. But, as the respondent contends, these would appear to be

Page 4

~1532
the two citations vacated in BrubakerÄMann, 2 FMSHRC 227 (1980).
Accordingly, I conclude that the Secretary has failed to prove
any adverse history on the part of respondent. The parties have
stipulated that the operator is a small company. The penalty
appears appropriate in relation to a small operator and it should
not affect the ability of the company to continue in business.

 Concerning the negligence of the operator: the condition

around the powder magazine was obvious. Several hundred railroad
ties are readily apparent. Accordingly, the operator must be
considered to be negligent. The gravity is minimal since it is
not likely that an explosion would occur. Finally, the operator
is credited with statutory good faith since the company abated the
violative condition.

 On balance, I consider that the proposed penalty of $20

should be reduced to $15.

                      Conclusions of Law

 Based on the entire record and the factual findings made in

the narrative portion of this decision, the following conclusions
of law are entered.

1. The Commission has jurisdiction to decide this case.

 2. Citation 2364576 should be affirmed and a penalty of $15

assessed.

 Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of

law I enter the following:

                            ORDER
1. Citation 2364576 is affirmed.

2. A civil penalty of $15 is assessed.


                           John J. Morris
                           Administrative Law Judge