Secretary of Labor v. Fife Rock Products Company, Inc. (ALJ decision, September 15, 1986)

Secretary of Labor v. Fife Rock Products Company, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 85-141-M): $600 penalty entered after missed hearing

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 85-141-M
Decided
September 15, 1986
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Checked against source
2026-10-19
Cited standards

What's the rule today?

This ALJ decision was superseded by the Commission's decision in the same case. Ezel starts from the controlling decision and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1986
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
ALJ decision, later reviewed by the Commission
This decision was issued by an FMSHRC Administrative Law Judge, but it was not the final word in the case: the Commission directed review, and the Commission's decision is the one citable as precedent.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Fife Rock Products did not appear for a hearing on an MSHA citation. Judge John J. Morris found the company in default and affirmed Citation 2360673 with the proposed $600 penalty. The Commission later reviewed the default, and the judge issued a separate decision after remand. This document records the earlier default order, not the later merits decision or its penalty.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 56.15007
  • Outcome: Default entered; Citation 2360673 and proposed $600 penalty affirmed in this order.
  • Key point: The judge entered default when the company failed to appear for its scheduled hearing.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. FIFE ROCK PRODUCTS
DDATE:
19860915
TTEXT:

~1362

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 85-141-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 42-00377-05502

v. Fife Brigham Pit

FIFE ROCK PRODUCTS COMPANY,
INC.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION

Appearances: Margaret A. Miller, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner.

Before: Judge Morris

This is a civil penalty proceeding initiated by petitioner against respondent in accordance with the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq. The civil penalty sought here is for the violation of 30 C.F.R. 56.15Ô7, a mandatory standard promulgated pursuant to the Act.

After notice to the parties, a hearing was scheduled in Salt Lake City, Utah on August 12, 1986. The petitioner appeared but respondent failed to appear.

Pursuant to Commission Rule 63(b), 29 C.F.R. 2700.63(b), respondent was found to be in default.

Accordingly, I enter the following:

ORDER

Citation 2360673 and the proposed civil penalty of $600 are affirmed.

John J. Morris
Administrative Law Judge

What controls your case today?

The Commission reviewed this case, and its decision is the one that controls. Ezel starts there and answers your situation under current law, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace