FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket WEST 85-132-DM Decided January 9, 1987 Settled Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr.

Dee Gold Mining Company

Dee Gold Mining Company (FMSHRC WEST 85-132-DM): Discrimination proceeding settled and dismissed

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1987 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Joseph E. Timko brought a Mine Act discrimination proceeding against Dee Gold Mining Company. The parties reached a settlement on the first day of the hearing, under which the company agreed to pay $925, less customary withholding deductions, in full satisfaction of the claims and requested remedies. The settlement covered back pay, reinstatement, and other remedies, and the company did not admit a violation. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved the settlement after payment was made and dismissed the proceeding with prejudice to Timko filing another section 105(c) action.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)
  • Outcome: The settlement was approved, payment was acknowledged, and the proceeding was dismissed.
  • Key point: An approved settlement resolved the discrimination proceeding without an admission of liability by the company.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. DEE GOLD
DDATE:
19870109
TTEXT:


Page 2

~66

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR, DISCRIMINATION PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), Docket No. WEST 85-132-DM
ON BEHALF OF MD 85-12
JOSEPH E. TIMKO,
COMPLAINANT Dee Gold Mine
v.

DEE GOLD MINING COMPANY,
RESPONDENT

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
AND DISMISSING PROCEEDING

Appearances: Marshall P. Salzman, Esq., Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of Labor, San Francisco,
California,
for Complainant;
Jay W. Luther, Esq., Chickering & Gregory, San
Francisco, California,
for Respondent.

Before: Judge Lasher

The parties reached an amicable resolution of this matter on
the first day of a hearing in two matters involving the Dee Gold
Mining Company. The terms of the agreement reached between the
Secretary on behalf of Joseph P. Timko and the Respondent are
that, in return for the payment of $925.00, less customary and
appropriate withholding deductions to be determined by
Respondent, Complainant agrees to accept such amount in full
satisfaction of all claims made in connection with his proceeding
and remedies claimed by him under the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977, including back pay, reinstatement, and all
other remedies contemplated by the Act and legal precedent. The
figure, $925.00, is an approximation of damages sustained by
Complainant as a result of the alleged violation.

Complainant has executed a written release of the Respondent
Dee Gold Mining Company which is attached to this decision and
order approving settlement and made a part hereof.

Respondent's actions executing the settlement and its
agreements in connection therewith shall not be construed as an
admission of violation of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act
of 1977.


Page 3

~67
It was the intent and understanding of both parties hereto that
Respondent would, within seven days or as soon thereafter as
possible, tender payment of the $925.00 less appropriate
deductions, to counsel for the Secretary, Mr. Marshall Salzman,
at this office address. Counsel for the Secretary has now
notified me in writing of such payment and acknowledges that I
may consider the complaint in this matter to be withdrawn with
prejudice to the Complainant to thereafter file any action under
Section 105(c), individually, or otherwise.

It is understood that the attached release signed by Joseph
P. Timko, relating more generally to the employment relationship
between Mr. Timko and Respondent, is broader in scope than the
specific jurisdiction afforded under the Act and should not be
construed to be limited by any of the specific terms of this
order approving settlement. Such release speaks for itself.

The parties are now in compliance with the settlement
reached and approved at hearing. Accordingly, this proceeding is
dismissed.

Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge


Page 4

~68
RELEASE OF DEE GOLD MINING COMPANY

Joseph E. Timko, complaining party in that certain matter
known as Joseph E. Timko, Complainant, v. Dee Gold Mining
Company, Respondent, Docket No. WEST 85-132-DM, MD 85-12, does
hereby release, remise, and forever discharge Dee Gold Mining
Company, a Nevada general partnership, from any and all claims,
demands, liability, indebtedness, causes of action, and claims
for relief arising from or in any way related to (a) any and all
matters alleged in the above-entitled proceeding; (b) any and all
matters involving or related to said Joseph E. Timko's employment
by the said Dee Gold Mining Company or the termination of said
employment.


Page 5

~69
This release is given fully and voluntarily, after consultation
with counsel, and Joseph E. Timko warrants that he has full
authority to execute this release and accomplish the objects
intended thereby, to wit the complete extinguishment of any of
the enumerated obligations of Dee Gold Mining Company to Joseph
E. Timko. Neither this release, nor the settlement of which it is
a part, shall be regarded as an admission of liability on the
part of Dee Gold Mining Company, which expressly denies liability
to Joseph E. Timko.

Joseph E. Timko waives any and all statutes or case law
designed to prevent the enforcement of this release in accordance
with its expressed terms.

JOSEPH E. TIMKO

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1987, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.