Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Kaiser Cement Corporation (ALJ decision, January 27, 1986)
Secretary of Labor v. Kaiser Cement Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 84-71-M): $4,750 blasting settlement approved
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1986 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary sought $5,100 in penalties for four violations at Kaiser Cement Corporation's Cushenbury Cement Plant. The violations arose from improper blasting procedures that resulted in an injury, and the company promptly abated them. Judge Michael A. Lasher, Jr. approved a $4,750 settlement. Three penalties remained at their proposed amounts, while the penalty for one citation fell from $1,000 to $650 because it arose from the same incident as the other charges and presented a question of proof. The judge ordered the company to pay within 30 days if it had not already paid.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: Four safety standards listed in the decision's settlement table, concerning citations 2245606 through 2245609.
- Outcome: Settlement approved for $4,750, reduced from the $5,100 proposed total.
- Key point: The judge accepted a reduced penalty for one of four charges from the same blasting incident because that charge presented a proof question.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. KAISER CEMENT
DDATE:
19860127
TTEXT:
~180
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 84-71-M
PETITIONER
A.C. 04-00157-05507
v. Cushenbury Cement Plant
KAISER CEMENT CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Lasher
Upon Petitioner's motion for approval of a proposed settlement, and the same appearing proper and in the full amount of the initial assessment as to 3 of the 4 violations involved, the settlement is approved.
The terms of the settlement are as follows:
Original
Health and Safety Proposed Settlement Citation Date Standard Violated Penalty Amount 2245606 11/17/83 56.6Ä113 $2,000 $2,000
2245607 11/17/83 56.6Ä117 2,000 2,000
2245608 11/17/83 56.6Ä161 1,000 650
2245609 11/17/83 56.5Ä112 100 100
Total $5,100 $4,750
In the premises, approval of the settlement is warranted.
The documentary record in this matter reflects that while the violations were promptly abated by Respondent, they resulted from a high degree of negligence and were of a high degree of gravity since an injury resulted from the improper blasting procedures practiced.
The reduction in the penalty originally proposed by the Secretary with respect to Citation No. 2245608 appears justified since it is but one of the four infractions charged arising from the same incident and since a question of proof exists as to such violation as charged.
In the 24 months preceding the violation, no alleged violations were assessed against the Respondent at the facility involved.
~181
The size of the Respondent, a large mine operator, ia approximately 2,025,808 man-hours per year. The size of the subject facility is approximately 550,000 man-hours per year.
The ability of the Respondent to continue in business will not be impaired by the payment of the settlement amounts specified.
In the premises, approval of the settlement is warranted.
Respondent, if it has not previously done so, is ordered to pay to the Secretary of Labor within 30 days from the date hereof the sum of $4,750.00.
Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace