Secretary of Labor v. Lake Fork Gravel, Inc. (ALJ decision, March 13, 1985)

Secretary of Labor v. Lake Fork Gravel, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 84-53-M): Six proposed penalties assessed after default

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 84-53-M
Decided
March 13, 1985
Presiding judge
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index for this docket. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

MSHA sought penalties for six alleged violations at Lake Fork Gravel's pit. Judge Michael A. Lasher Jr. found that the company had not answered a show cause order, met prehearing requirements, or shown good cause for those failures. He entered a default and found that the company had waived its right to a hearing and to contest the proposed penalties. The judge canceled the scheduled hearing and ordered the company to pay $154 within 30 days. The decision lists the six citation numbers and penalties but does not describe the underlying safety standards.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard: The decision does not identify the standards for the six citations.
  • Outcome: Default entered; six proposed penalties assessed, totaling $154.
  • Key point: Failure to respond to the show cause order and prehearing requirements led to assessment of the proposed penalties.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. LAKE FORK PIT
DDATE:
19850313
TTEXT:
~414
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 84-53-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 10-01249-05501

v. Lake Fork Pit

LAKE FORK GRAVEL, INC.,
RESPONDENT

ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND FINAL DECISION
AND ORDER OF ASSESSMENT

Before: Judge Lasher

Respondent, Lake Fork Gravel, Inc., has failed to respond to my Order to Show Cause dated February 26, 1985. Respondent has also failed to comply with the Prehearing Requirements set forth in the Notice of Hearing herein dated February 7, 1985, in two respects. First, it has failed to respond to initiatives of counsel for the Petitioner, Rochelle Kleinberg, to communicate with it to comply with such requirements.(Footnote.1) Secondly, Respondent has failed to file with the undersigned the written submissions required by the second paragraph of such prehearing requirements. Thus, Respondent effectively has become unreachable by all reasonable processes of communication and has otherwise failed to establish good cause for its various failures to comply with standard prehearing requirements. Accordingly, it is found to be in default and to have waived its right to a hearing and to contest the proposed penalties for the 6 violations alleged and described in Petitioner's Proposal for Assessment of Penalty. 29 C.F.R. 2700.63.
~415
It is therefore ordered that the hearing scheduled to commence in Boise, Idaho, on March 19, 1985, be CANCELLED, and that Respondent pay the following penalties, totaling $154.00, to the Secretary of Labor within 30 days from the date hereof:

Citation Number Penalty

2225896 $ 54.00
2225897
20.00
2225898
20.00
2225899
20.00
2225900
20.00
2226501
20.00

Total $154.00

Michael A. Lasher, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge

ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
Footnotes start here:-

~Footnote_one

1 Counsel for the Secretary has advised me on March 11, 1985, that she has called Respondent's Sacramento, California phone number (916) 929-4245)) on two occasions, 2/12/85 and 2/19/85, and left messages but that Respondent has failed to return these calls; Counsel has also tried to reach Respondent on numerous occasions at its Idaho number (208) 634-2158)) to no avail.

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace