Secretary of Labor v. Standard Metals Corporation (ALJ decision, January 4, 1985)

Secretary of Labor v. Standard Metals Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 83-56-M): Five penalty cases settled, one citation dismissed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
WEST 83-56-M, WEST 83-116-M, WEST 84-18-M, WEST 84-60-M, WEST 84-79-M
Decided
January 4, 1985
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-20

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1985 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This settlement decision became final as amended under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1), with no later Commission review appearing in the official index. Its penalty total was corrected by the January 23, 1985 [amended decision](west-83-56-m-alj.md); read the two releases together. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Standard Metals Corporation and the Secretary settled five consolidated civil penalty cases concerning its Sunnyside Mine when the first case came to hearing. The Secretary agreed to dismiss one citation arising from a heavy equipment accident for lack of sufficient evidence. Standard Metals withdrew its contests to the remaining citations, which concerned heavy equipment, smoking materials near explosives, a defective hoist, travelway fall hazards, and workplace access. Judge John A. Carlson approved the settlements, dismissed the one citation with prejudice, and affirmed the others. The January 4 order stated a $5,672 total penalty, payable within 40 days. It did not identify the regulatory numbers underlying the citations.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standards: The decision describes the citation subjects but does not identify their regulation numbers.
  • Outcome: Settlements approved; one citation dismissed, the others affirmed; January 4 text states $5,672, later corrected by amendment.
  • Key point: The parties resolved all five cases by agreement, with one citation dismissed for insufficient evidence.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. STANDARD METALS
DDATE:
19850104
TTEXT:
~7

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 83-56-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 05-00417-05508

Docket No. WEST 83-116-M
A.C. No. 05-00417-05512

V. Docket No. WEST 84-18-M
A.C. No. 05-00417-05513

Docket No. WEST 84-60-M
A.C. No. 05-00417-05518

STANDARD METALS CORPORATION, Docket No. WEST 84-79-M
RESPONDENT
A.C. No. 05-00417-05523

Sunnyside Mine

DECISION

Appearances: James H. Barkley, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner;
Zach C. Miller, Esq., Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Denver, Colorado, for Respondent.

Before: Judge Carlson

Each of the docket numbers listed in the caption was originally scheduled for hearing sequentially, commencing October 31, 1984, at Denver, Colorado. When the first case was called for hearing, however, the parties announced that all issues in the five docket numbers involved in this proceeding were settled.(footnote 1) The settled cases were therefore consolidated and the parties placed the terms of the settlements upon the record.
~8
Docket No. WEST 83Ä56ÄM involved two citations which arose from a heavy equipment accident. The Secretary agreed to dismiss Citation No. 2096842 for lack of sufficient evidence. The respondent agreed to withdraw its notice of contest to Citation No. 2096841, and to pay the full civil penalty of $1,000.00 originally sought by the Secretary.

Docket No. WEST 83Ä116ÄM involved a single citation arising out of a use of smoking materials near explosives. The respondent agreed to withdraw its notice of contest and to pay the full civil penalty of $600.00 originally sought by the Secretary.

Docket No. WEST 84Ä18ÄM involved a single citation relating to a defective hoist. The respondent agreed to withdraw its notice of contest and to pay the full civil penalty of $2,000.00 originally sought by the Secretary.

Docket No. WEST 84Ä60ÄM involved two citations arising from travelway falling hazards (Citations No. 2096626 and No. 2096628). The respondent agreed to withdraw its notice of contest to both, and to pay the full civil penalties of $36.00 originally sought by the Secretary for each.

Docket No. WEST 84Ä79ÄM involved a single citation relating to a lack of safe access to a workplace. The respondent agreed to withdraw its notice of contest and to pay the full civil penalty of $2,000.00 originally sought by the Secretary.

I conclude that the terms of the agreement are in accord with the purposes of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and should therefore be approved.

Accordingly, all citations embraced in the five docket numbers are ORDERED affirmed except for Citation No. 2096842 in Docket No. WEST 83Ä56ÄM, which is dismissed with prejudice.

Further, respondent is ORDERED to pay, within 40 days of the date of this decision, a total $5,672.00 for those citations which are affirmed.

John A. Carlson
Administrative Law Judge
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
Footnotes start here:-

~Footnote_one

1 Two other cases set for the same time were not settled; they proceeded to hearings on the merits, and are not dealt with in this decision.

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace