Secretary of Labor on behalf of Dianne Meuller v. Aaron Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, May 14, 1981)

Meuller v. Aaron Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 81-99-DM): Discrimination settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 81-99-DM
Decided
May 14, 1981
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-22
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1981 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1981
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision under the Mine Act's 40-day rule
This administrative law judge decision became a final decision of the Commission because no Commissioner directed review within 40 days, under 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is binding on the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Dianne Meuller filed a Mine Act discrimination complaint after her employment at Aaron Mining ended. The parties agreed that Aaron Mining would pay her $6,300 and remove references to the complaint from her personnel record. Because the company no longer operated a Nevada mine, it could not reinstate her immediately, but it agreed to offer comparable work if it resumed qualifying operations in Nevada within 12 months. Meuller agreed to withdraw her complaint, and Judge George A. Koutras approved the settlement and granted dismissal. The decision makes no finding that the company violated the Act.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(1).
  • Outcome: Settlement approved and discrimination complaint dismissed; $6,300 payment, record expungement, and a conditional future job offer agreed.
  • Key point: The order resolved the complaint by consent without deciding whether unlawful discrimination occurred.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. AARON MINING
DDATE:
19810514
TTEXT:

~1262
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR
Complaint of Discrimination
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATIVE (MSHA)
Docket No. WEST 81-99-DM
ON BEHALF OF DIANNE MEULLER,
COMPLAINANTS Aaron Crescent Valley Mine v.

AARON MINING, INC.,
RESPONDENT

Appearances: Linda R. Bytof, Attorney, U.S. Department of Labor, San Francisco, California, for the complainants; Bruce T.
Beesley, Esquire, Reno, Nevada, for the respondent.

DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT

Before: Judge Koutras

Statement of the Case
This is a discrimination proceeding initiated by the complainants against the respondent pursuant to section 105(c)(1) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, charging the respondent with unlawful discrimination against the complainant Dianne Meuller for exercising certain rights afforded her under the Act. The matter was initially scheduled for hearing in Reno, Nevada on March 17, 1981, but the matter was continued at the request of both parties. A further continuance was granted when the parties advised me of a proposed settlement disposition of the controversy.

Discussion

On May 4, 1981, MSHA filed a motion to dismiss, complainant's consent, and the settlement agreement. In support of the motion to dismiss, MSHA states as follows:

1. On May 4, 1981, Dianne Meuller and Respondent Aaron Mining, Inc. entered into a settlement agreement resolving the issues raised by Complainant's discrimination complaint.

2. By the terms of the agreement, Complainant, Dianne Meuller, agreed to withdraw her discrimination complaint filed with the Mine Safety and Health Review Administration on May 23, 1980.

~1263
3. Complainant, Dianne Meuller has authorized the Secretary of Labor to move for dismissal of the Complaint filed on her behalf, as evidenced by the attached statement of Complainant's consent.

Pursuant to the agreement between Complainant, Dianne Meuller and Respondent, Aaron Mining, Inc., the proposed settlement is as follows:

1. Respondent, Aaron Mining, Inc., agrees to pay Dianne Meuller the sum of $6,300.00 payable upon Ms.
Meuller's execution and delivery of the agreement.

2. Respondent further agrees to expunge from Ms.
Meuller's personnel records any and all reference to the circumstances relating to the subject complaint of discrimination.

3. Insofar as Respondent currently is not engaged in the operation of any mine within the State of Nevada, Respondent cannot reinstate Ms. Meuller to her former job as a blaster. However, if during the twelve (12) month period subsequent to the date of execution of the agreement by Respondent, Respondent commences to operate any mine within the State of Nevada, and directly employs at said mine individuals with duties similar to that of a blaster, Respondent further agrees to offer Ms. Meuller employment in said mine in any job with the same or similar duties and at the same rate of pay she was earning at the date of her termination from the Aaron Crescent Valley Mine.

4. Complainant, Dianne Meuller, agrees to withdraw the subject complaint of discrimination filed with the Mine Safety and Health Administration on May 23, 1980 and hereby authorizes the Secretary of Labor to dismiss the complaint filed with the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission on her behalf.

5. Upon execution of the Settlement Agreement, the payment of $6,300.00, and the expungement of her personnel records, as aforesaid, Complainant agrees to and hereby releases Aaron Mining, Inc. from any and all liability arising out of her termination from Aaron Mining, Inc. on April 24, 1980, which is the subject of her Complaint referred to herein.

MSHA has submitted a copy of a consent statement executed by Ms. Meuller on May 4, 1981, which verifies that she voluntarily withdrew her complaint and entered into the settlement agreement with respondent. Under the circumstances, I see no reason why the motion should not be granted.

ORDER

In view of the foregoing, the proposed settlement

disposition of this matter is APPROVED and the Complainant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

George A. Koutras
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace