Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Wayne Kendall (ALJ decision, January 17, 1984)
Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Wayne Kendall (FMSHRC WEST 81-406-M): Plant manager's personal penalty settled for $100
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1984 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
MSHA sought a $300 personal penalty against Wayne Kendall, the plant manager at Riverside Cement's Crestmore Mine, after a miner was injured in a feed hopper where safety belts and a tended lifeline were not used. The corporate operator had paid a separate $5,000 penalty for the underlying safety violation. Kendall agreed to pay $100 and stopped contesting the charge. Judge Virgil E. Vail approved the settlement, considering that Kendall had not directly supervised the injured miner and had helped establish safety procedures afterward. The judge ordered dismissal of Kendall's case upon clearance of his $100 check.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard: 30 C.F.R. § 57.15-5, requiring safety belts and tended lifelines in dangerous areas; personal liability under 30 U.S.C. § 820(c).
- Outcome: Proposed $300 personal penalty settled for $100; dismissal ordered upon clearance of the payment check.
- Key point: The judge approved a reduced personal penalty based on the parties' stated mitigating circumstances.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. WAYNE KENDALL
DDATE:
19840117
TTEXT:
~113
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 81-406-M
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 04-00010-05025 A
v. Crestmore Mine
WAYNE KENDALL,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Before: Judge Vail
This is a civil penalty proceeding filed by the petitioner against Wayne Kendall, (hereinafter "Kendall"), as an individual agent of the Riverside Cement Company, the corporate operator of the Crestmore Mine located in Riverside, California. Kendall in this case was acting as the operator's plant manager at the Crestmore Mine.
On November 1, 1979, Order No. 375785 was issued by the Mine Safety and Health Administration to the Riverside Cement Company, pursuant to section 107(a) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, 30 U.S.C. 817(a), citing a violation of safety standard 30 C.F.R. 57.15-5. (FOOTNOTE 1) Said order reads as follows:
A serious accident occurred at the Crestmore Mine when an employee entered the feed hopper at the dynapactor (crusher) to free a bridged material hangup. The bridged material broke through dropping the employee onto the pan feeder and loose material from above came down covering the employee. Safety belts, lines, and a person in attendance on the line were not being used in this dangerous location.
~114
Riverside Cement Company has paid an uncontested civil penalty assessment of $5,000 for the foregoing violation under MSHA Assessment Office Case No. 04-00010-0511-I.
Kendall was charged in this case under section 110(c) of the Act, 30 U.S.C. | 820(c), with knowing, authorizing, ordering, or carrying out said violation charged above against Riverside Cement Corporation, as their agent.
The petitioner filed a civil penalty proceeding against Kendall, proposing the assessment of a $300.00 civil penalty. This matter was set for hearing on November 16, 1982 in Riverside, California. On November 15, 1982, the petitioner and Kendall filed a joint motion for approval of a settlement and for dismissal of this case. Kendall tendered a check for $100.00 in settlement of the proposed civil penalty and indicated he no longer wished to contest the charges against him.
The parties represent that there was a serious violation in this case involving an accident wherein a miner sustained back injuries, multiple abrasions and lacerations. However, as a mitigating factor, Kendall was not directly supervising the injured miner at the time of the accident. Also, Kendall showed good faith after notification of the violation in helping to implement, at a mine safety meeting, proper procedures for when and where to use safety belts and lines to guard against a future occurrence of a similar accident.
Based on a review of the record in this case and the representations of the parties, I find the settlement proposed is in accord with the purpose and policy of the Act.
ORDER
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion by the petitioner and Kendall be, and hereby is, GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that upon clearance of Kendall's tendered $100.00 check as payment of the offered sum herein, the captioned matter is DISMISSED.
Virgil E. Vail
Administrative Law Judge
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
~FOOTNOTE_ONE
1 30 C.F.R. | 57.15 5 provides as follows:
Mandatory. Safety belts and lines shall be worn when men work where there is danger of falling; a second person shall tend the lifeline when bins, tanks, or other dangerous areas are entered.
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace