Secretary of Labor v. Medicine Bow Coal Company (ALJ decision, June 14, 1984)
Secretary of Labor v. Medicine Bow Coal Company (FMSHRC WEST 81-163): Settlement approved for two citations
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1984 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Medicine Bow Coal Company faced five mine safety citations in this penalty case. The company and the Secretary agreed to resolve two of them by withdrawing the contests and paying the originally proposed penalties. Judge John A. Carlson treated their motion as a settlement request under section 110(k) of the Mine Act, approved it, and affirmed citations 828415 and 828439. The order required payment of $395 for the first citation and $345 for the second within 40 days. The judge said a separate decision issued at the same time resolved the other three citations after a hearing.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standards: None identified in this settlement decision; the judge cited section 110(k) of the Mine Act for settlement approval.
- Outcome: Settlement approved; two citations affirmed with $740 in total penalties.
- Key point: This order resolves only two of the five citations in docket WEST 81-163.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. MEDICINE COAL
DDATE:
19840614
TTEXT:
Page 2
~1537
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 81-163
PETITIONER
A.C. No. 48-00900-03018
v.
Medicine Bow Mine
MEDICINE BOW COAL COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
DECISION APPROVING SETTLEMENT
Appearances: James H. Barkley, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner;
Brent L. Motchan, Esq., Medicine Bow Coal Company, St. Louis,M Missouri, for Respondent.
Before: Judge Carlson
The parties have submitted a motion styled "Stipulation, Motion to Withdraw Notice of Contest, and Order Payment." The motion would dispose of two of the five citations comprising Docket No. WEST 81-163. It relates to citations 828415 and 828439. (The remaining citations, 828440, 828442 and 828443, are dealt with in a full decision following hearing on the merits, issued contemporaneously with this present settlement.)
The parties, in the present motion, ask that respondent be granted leave to pay the full penalties originally proposed for the two citations in question, and to withdraw its notices of contest. Under section 110(k) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 801, et seq.), I construe the pleading as one for approval of a settlement agreement.
The agreement is appropriate and is approved in its entirety. Accordingly, citations 828415 and 828439 are affirmed. Respondent shall, within 40 days of the date of this decision, pay a civil penalty of $395.00 in connection with citation 828415 and $345.00 in connection with citation 828415 and $345.00 in connection with citation 828439.
SO ORDERED.
John A. Carlson
Administrative Law Judge
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace