Secretary of Labor on behalf of Jeffrey S. Hotchkiss v. Climax Molybdenum Company (ALJ decision, June 2, 1981)
Jeffrey S. Hotchkiss v. Climax Molybdenum Company (FMSHRC WEST 81-130-DM): Secretary's discrimination complaint withdrawn
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1981 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Secretary sought to withdraw a discrimination complaint filed on behalf of Jeffrey S. Hotchkiss against Climax Molybdenum Company, saying the evidence was insufficient to continue. Hotchkiss consented, and the company did not oppose withdrawal. Judge John A. Carlson granted the motion and dismissed the Secretary's proceeding with prejudice. Because Hotchkiss had not waived his separate right to bring a complaint under Mine Act section 105(c)(3), the judge gave him 30 days from receiving the order to file one with the Commission. The order did not decide whether discrimination had occurred.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(c)(3)
- Outcome: Secretary's complaint dismissed with prejudice; miner's separate filing right preserved for 30 days after receipt of the order.
- Key point: Withdrawal of the Secretary's complaint did not extinguish the miner's right to bring his own complaint without an affirmative waiver.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM
DDATE:
19810602
TTEXT:
~1447
Federal Mine Safty and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
COMPLAINT OF DISCHARGE
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
DISCRIMINATION OR INTERFERENCE
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
ON BEHALF OF
DOCKET NO. WEST 81-130-DM
JEFFREY S. HOTCHKISS,
COMPLAINANT MINE: Climax Mine v.
CLIMAX MOLYBDENUM COMPANY,
RESPONDENT
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Secretary of Labor has moved to withdraw his complaint of discrimination filed on behalf of Jeffrey S. Hotchkiss. Withdrawal is sought on the grounds that insufficient evidence exists to continue prosecution. Mr. Hotchkiss has filed a formal consent to the withdrawal of the complaint. Respondent does not oppose the motion.
The Secretary's motion is granted, and this present proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.
The Secretary's motion and the miner's accompanying consent, however, are silent as to whether the dismissal should foreclose the miner's right to prosecute his own complaint under section 105(c)(3) of the Act. The Secretary's determination to withdraw can stand no differently than an initial determination not to file a complaint; it cannot deprive the miner of his right to initiate his own complaint.(FOOTNOTE.1) Because there has been no affirmative waiver of that right, Mr. Hotchkiss is granted 30 days from his receipt of this order in which to file his own complaint with the Commission, should he wish to do so.
SO ORDERED.
John A. Carlson
Administrative Law Judge
ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ
~FOOTNOTE_ONE
Cf. S. Rep. No. 95-181 95th Cong. 1st Sess. at 37 (1977); reprinted in Senate Subcommittee on Labor, Committee on Human Resources, 95th Cong., 2d Sess. Legislative History of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 at 626 (1978).
What applies to your situation today?
This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace