Secretary of Labor on behalf of James Franklin Coulter v. Cotter Corporation (ALJ decision, May 4, 1981)

Coulter v. Cotter Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 81-11-DM): Discharge complaint settled for $1,000

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 81-11-DM
Decided
May 4, 1981
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-22

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1981 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1981
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision under the Mine Act's 40-day rule
This administrative law judge decision became a final decision of the Commission because no Commissioner directed review within 40 days, under 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is binding on the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

James Franklin Coulter and Cotter Corporation agreed to settle his discharge complaint. The company agreed to pay him $1,000 for lost wages and other expenses, remove adverse discharge references from his employment record, and provide him a corrected copy. Judge John A. Carlson approved the agreed terms and dismissed the case with prejudice. The decision records no finding that Cotter violated the Mine Act.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): No specific mine safety standard cited in this settlement order.
  • Outcome: Settlement approved and complaint dismissed with prejudice; $1,000 compensation and record correction agreed.
  • Key point: The parties resolved the discharge claim by consent without a merits ruling.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) v. COTTER CORPORATION
DDATE:
19810504
TTEXT:

~1209
Federal Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR
COMPLAINT OF DISCHARGE,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
DISCRIMINATION OR INTERFERENCE
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
ON BEHALF OF JAMES
DOCKET NO. WEST 81-11-DM
FRANKLIN COULTER,
COMPLAINANT
MINE: Cotter Mill
v.
COTTER CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT

DECISION AND ORDER

On April 23, 1981, the parties to this proceeding filed with the Commission a Stipulation of Settlement, Consent, and Motion seeking an agreed disposition of the case.

Under the terms of the stipulation, the parties agree that respondent shall compensate James Franklin Coulter in the amount of $1,000.00 for loss of back wages and other expenses resulting from his discharge; that respondent shall expunge the employment record of James Franklin Coulter of any adverse references relating to his discharge; and that James Franklin Coulter shall accept the above stipulations as full settlement of the claim giving rise to this case.

By joint motion, the parties therefore seek an order providing that within 40 days respondent tender the agreed upon sum to complainant; that respondent expunge from complainant's employment record any adverse references relating to his discharge; that respondent transmit to complainant a copy of his employment record reflecting the deletion of any adverse references relating to his discharge; and that the confidential files of respondent's attorney may be introduced as evidence in any subsequent proceeding brought by complainant against respondent relating to his discharge.

Given complainant's consent to the terms of the settlement and finding that such settlement will effectuate the purposes of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. 801 et seq., it is

ORDERED: that the settlement agreed to by the parties is hereby APPROVED, that the joint motion is hereby GRANTED in full and, that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

John A. Carlson
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace