Secretary of Labor v. Central Pre-Mix Concrete Co. (ALJ decision, September 24, 1980)

Central Pre-Mix Concrete Co. (FMSHRC WEST 80-325-M): $254 silica dust and posting settlement approved

Decision type
ALJ decision
Docket
WEST 80-325-M
Decided
September 24, 1980
Presiding judge
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23
Cited standards

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1980 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
No later Commission review appears in the official index, so this decision became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Central Pre-Mix Concrete and MSHA proposed a $254 settlement for four silica dust exposure violations and one failure to post violation at the Pasco Pit. The judge noted that the measured dust levels exceeded threshold limit values but that MSHA had not supplied a meaningful evaluation of the alleged exposure's long-term health impact. On the record presented, he treated the charges as de minimis and approved the agreed penalties. He ordered payment by October 10, 1980 and dismissal upon payment.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 819(a) for posting; the decision does not identify the silica dust standards by number.
  • Outcome: $254 settlement approved for five violations; dismissal subject to payment.
  • Key point: The judge approved the settlement on the limited gravity evidence submitted for the dust charges.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

CCASE:
SOL (MSHA) V. CENTRAL PRE-MIX CONCRETE
DDATE:
19800924
TTEXT:
~2825

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission Office of Administrative Law Judges

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Civil Penalty Proceeding
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
Docket No. WEST 80-325-M
PETITIONER
A.O. No. 45-00730-05004

v. Pasco Pit

CENTRAL PRE-MIX CONCRETE CO.,
RESPONDENT

DECISION AND ORDER

The parties move for approval of a settlement of four violations of the threshold limit values for silica dust in the amounts initially assessed, $56.00 each, and one failure to post violation of section 109(a) at $30.00. The total settlement proposed for the five violations charged is $254.00.

A review of the respirable dust violations shows the concentrations exceeded the threshold limit values (TLV) by 200% to 400%. Despite this the only evaluation of gravity (made by the inspector) notes that the time weighted average was more than 20% of the TLV. It seems obvious, therefore, that MSHA, at least for the purposes of this motion, has chosen not to furnish a meaningful evaluation of the impact of long-term exposure to the concentrations alleged on the health of the miners involved. For these reasons I can only conclude that the miners involved were not subject to a significant risk of material health impairment. Compare, Industrial Union Dept. v. American Petrol. Inst. _ U.S. ___, No. 78-911, decided July 2, 1980, Slip op. 41-49.

The premises considered, and after considering the other criteria applicable, I find that in view of the de minimis nature of the violations charged the settlement proposed is acceptable.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion to approve settlement be, and hereby is, GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the operator pay the penalty agreed upon, $254.00, on or before Friday, October 10, 1980 and that subject to payment the captioned matter be DISMISSED.

Joseph B. Kennedy
Administrative Law Judge

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace