Secretary of Labor (MSHA) v. Arch Mineral Corporation (Commission decision, February 7, 1980)
Arch Mineral Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 79-58): Interlocutory review petition denied
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Arch Mineral Corporation asked the Commission to review a judge's order allowing the Secretary of Labor to file a proposed penalty late. The Commission denied the petition for interlocutory review. It noted that the events fell during a transition between its interim and final procedural rules. It expressly left open what circumstances might excuse a late filing and how final Rule 27(a) would apply. The Commission also said its denial did not approve the Secretary's failure to file on time. This order assessed no penalty.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: Commission Rule 27(a), discussed but not interpreted in this order.
- Outcome: Interlocutory review petition denied; the proposed penalty case was left for further proceedings.
- Key point: The Commission did not decide whether the Secretary's late filing was excusable under the final rule.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
CCASE:
MSHA V. ARCH MINERAL
DDATE:
19800207
TTEXT:
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC
February 7, 1980
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
v. Docket N . WEST 79-58
ARCH MINERAL CORPORATION
ORDER
Arch Mineral Corporation's petition for interlocutory review of an order of the administrative law judge that granted the Secretary of Labor's Motion to Accept Late Filing of Proposal for Penalty is denied. We do not pass on the question of what circumstances,if any, may excuse the late filing of a Proposal for Penalty. Because the events in this case occurred during the period of transition between the Commission's interim and final procedural rules, issues concerning the interpretation of final Commission Rule 27(a) are not presented squarely by this petition for interlocutory review. Our denial of the petition is not to be construed in any way as approval of the failure by the Secretary to timely file a proposal for a penalty in this or any other case.
Richard V. Backley, Commissioner
~277
DISTRIBUTION
Brent L. Motchan, Esq.
Arch Mineral Corporation
500 North Broadway
Suite 1800
St. Louis, Missouri 63102
Phyllis K. Caldwell, Esq.
U.S. Department of Labor
Office of the Solicitor
1585 Federal Building
1961 Stout Street
Denver, Colorado 80294
Administrative Law Judge John J. Morris
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission 333 West Colfax Denver, Colorado 80294
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace