FMSHRC Commission decision Docket WEST 2026-0003 Decided May 21, 2026 Procedural

Secretary of Labor v. Mountain Stone Aggregates

Secretary of Labor v. Mountain Stone Aggregates (FMSHRC WEST 2026-0003): Misaddressed assessment never became final

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2026, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Mountain Stone asked to reopen a proposed penalty assessment that appeared to have become final. Postal tracking showed that MSHA's mailing was not delivered because the address was insufficient, and the operator reported repeated mailings to the wrong address. The Secretary did not oppose relief and said it would work with the operator to correct the address problem. The Commission held that an assessment sent to an improper address was not properly served and therefore never became a final order. It dismissed the reopening request as moot and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: The motion to reopen was found moot, and the case was remanded because no final order existed.
  • Key point: A penalty assessment mailed to an improper address does not become a final Commission order.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

May 21, 2026

SECRETARY OF LABOR MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) v. MOUNTAIN STONE AGGREGATES, | Docket No. WEST 2026-0003 A.C. No. 45-03769-623672 |

BEFORE: Rajkovich, Chair; Jordan, and Baker, Commissioners

ORDER

BY: THE COMMISSION

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.

§ 801 et seq. (2024) (“Mine Act”). On November 10, 2025, the Commission received from Mountain Stone Aggregates (“Mountain Stone”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had appeared to become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

In its motion, Mountain Stone represents that it did not receive the subject proposed penalty assessment from the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”). Instead, the operator contends that MSHA has—on multiple occasions—sent mail to the wrong address. The Secretary does not oppose the operator’s request. The United States Post Office tracking records attached to the Secretary’s response indicate that the assessment was not delivered to Mountain Stone because of an “insufficient address.” Sec’y Ex. B. The Secretary represents that it will work with the operator to resolve issues with the description of the operator’s physical address, which may contribute to problems with delivery.1

Having reviewed Mountain Stone’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that the proposed penalty assessment did not become a final order of the Commission because it was not properly served on the operator. The Commission has held that when an assessment is sent to an improper address, it does not become a final order, so a request to reopen the assessment is moot. See Petra Materials, 32 FMSHRC 1113, 1116 (Sept. 2010); see also, e.g.,

[]1 We note that the Commission has already addressed a motion to reopen from Mountain Stone with the same issue arising from a proposed assessment issued four months later.

Mountain Stone Aggregate, 48 FMSHRC 35 (Jan. 2026). If it has not done so already, MSHA should take prompt action to update its records so that this problem does not reoccur.

American Sand Co. LLC, 42 FMSHRC 767 (Oct. 2020) (applying this principle to an order of default when the Chief Judge’s order to show cause was sent to the wrong address).

Accordingly, we hold that there is no final order and the operator’s motion to reopen is moot. The case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission's Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

Timothy J. Baker, Commissioner

Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr., Chair

Distribution:

Kim Redding, Consultant

N – Compliance Safety Services, Inc. 2949 S. Jiovanni Ave.

Meridian, ID 83642 [email protected]

Jennifer A. Ledig, Esq. Thomas A. Paige, Esq. Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

Division of Mine Safety and Health

200 Constitution Avenue NW, Suite N4428 Washington, DC 20210 [email protected] [email protected]

Melanie Garris

[email protected]

Acting Chief Judge David P. Simonton

[email protected]

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 2026. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.