Secretary of Labor v. Nevada Gold Mines, LLC (Commission decision, September 24, 2020)

Secretary of Labor v. Nevada Gold Mines, LLC (FMSHRC WEST 2019-0512-M, WEST 2019-0513-M): Reopening motions withdrawn

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
WEST 2019-0512-M, WEST 2019-0513-M
Decided
September 24, 2020
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-31

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Nevada Gold Mines had filed motions asking the Commission to reopen two final penalty assessments. The company later told the Commission that it no longer wished to pursue those requests. The Commission granted both withdrawal motions and dismissed the consolidated matter. The short release does not identify the underlying citations, safety standards, or penalty amounts.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: None
  • Outcome: Both reopening motions were withdrawn, and the consolidated matter was dismissed.
  • Key point: The Commission ended both cases after Nevada Gold voluntarily abandoned its reopening requests.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004-1710

SECRETARY OF
LABOR,                              :         Docket No. WEST 2019-0512-M

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH                    :     A.C. No.   26-02286-486626

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)                       :        

:         Docket No. WEST 2019-0513-M

v.                                              
:         A.C. No.   26-02286-490669

:

NEVADA GOLD MINES, LLC                      
  :

BEFORE: Rajkovich, Chairma n ; Althen and Traynor, Commis s io n ers

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977,  30 U.S.C.     § 801 et seq. (2018)  (“Mine Act”). Previously, Nevada Gold filed motions to reopen two penalty assessments that had become final orders of the Commission in Docket Nos. WEST 2019-0512-M and WEST 2019-0513-M, [1] pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act,  30 U.S.C. § 815(a) . Nevada Gold has now informed the Commission that it has decided not to pursue its motions to reopen. Accordingly, Nevada Gold moves to withdraw its motions to reopen.

Having considered Nevada Gold’s motions   to   withdraw , we hereby grant its requests. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed.

/s/ Marco M. Rajkovich,
Jr.

Marco M.
Rajkovich, Jr., Chairman

/s/ William I.
Althen

William I.
Althen, Commissioner

/s/ Arthur R.
Traynor, III

Arthur R. Traynor, III, Commissioner

Distribution (e-mail):

Christopher G. Peterson

Fisher Phillips LLP

[email protected]

Emily Toler Scott, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

[email protected]

Chief Administrative Law Judge Glynn F. Voisin

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

[email protected]

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine Safety and Health Administration

[email protected]

[1]
For the limited purpose of addressing these motions
to reopen, we hereby consolidate docket numbers WEST 2019-0512-M and WEST 2019-0513-M, involving similar procedural issues. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.12 .

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace