Secretary of Labor v. Mountain Cement Company (Commission decision, May 4, 2018)

Secretary of Labor v. Mountain Cement Company (FMSHRC WEST 2017-638 M): Delayed reopening motion denied

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEST 2017-638 M
Decided
May 4, 2018
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-01
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Mountain Cement said it mistakenly mailed a penalty-contest form with payment for an uncontested citation to MSHA's St. Louis office instead of the Arlington contest office. That explained the initial default, but the operator waited 84 days after receiving a delinquency notice before moving to reopen. Commission precedent generally requires a reopening motion within 30 days after the operator learns of the delinquency, or a satisfactory explanation for additional delay. Mountain Cement gave no explanation for the late motion, so the Commission denied reopening despite the Secretary's lack of opposition.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: Section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
  • Outcome: Mountain Cement's motion to reopen the final penalty assessment was denied.
  • Key point: Excusable neglect causing the original default does not excuse an unexplained delay of more than 30 days after a delinquency notice reveals the problem.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH   

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA)        

v.

MOUNTAIN
CEMENT COMPANY,

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket
No. WEST 2017-638-M

A.C.
No. 48-00007-433214

BEFORE:  Althen,
Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE
COMMISSION:

This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.   
§ 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On August 22, 2016, the Commission received from Mountain Cement Company (“Mountain Cement”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

Under
section 105(a), an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“ JWR ”). In evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR , 15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep. Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on March 10, 2017, and became a final order of the Commission on April 10, 2017. Mountain Cement asserts that it inadvertently sent the contest form to MSHA’s St. Louis office with a check for an uncontested citation instead of to the Arlington office. Upon learning of its mistake, Mountain Cement asserts that it contacted counsel in order to seek reopening. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, but urges the operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed.

In its request to reopen, Mountain
Cement includes an affidavit from its safety director stating that it learned that the citation had become final when it received a delinquency notice on May 30, 2017.  The Secretary states that the delinquency notice was issued on May 24, 2017. Mountain Cement did not file its request to reopen until August 22, 2017, 90 days after the delinquency notice was sent and 84 days after it was received. Settled commission case law requires an operator to file a motion to reopen within 30 days following receipt of a delinquency notice. If the operator fails to do so, it must provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay. See Concrete Mobility, LLC , 37 FMSHRC 1709, 1710 (Aug. 2015); Lone Mountain Processing, Inc. , 33 FMSHRC 2373 (Oct. 2011); Highland Mining , 31 FMSHRC 1313, 1317 (Nov. 2009). Here, the operator has given reasons for its initial failure to timely contest the orders at issue. However, it has not provided any explanation for its failure to request reopening within 30 days of learning of its delinquency. Accordingly, we deny Mountain Cement’s motion.

/s/ William I. Althen

William I. Althen, Acting Chairman

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner

/s/ Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

Distribution:

Lauren
M. Marino, Esq.

Ogletree,
Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

1909
K St. N.W., Suite 1000

Washington,
DC 20006

Ali
Beydoun, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South, Suite 401

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N

Washington,
DC 20004-1710

Melanie
Garris

Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine
Safety and Health Administration

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace