Secretary of Labor v. Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (Commission decision, March 28, 2017)
Secretary of Labor v. Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (FMSHRC WEST 2015-690 M): Split-docket oversight default reopened
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2017, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Lehigh timely contested an assessment that MSHA later split into multiple dockets. The company answered a show-cause order in the companion docket but overlooked the separate order in this case, causing a default. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged Lehigh to answer every penalty petition and take show-cause orders seriously. Because the default had already become a final Commission decision under the 40-day rule, relief required Commission action. The Commission reopened the proceeding in the interest of justice, vacated the default order, and remanded for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b) and 2700.70(a)
- Outcome: The final default order was vacated and the penalty case was remanded.
- Key point: When one assessment is split into multiple dockets, the operator must respond separately in each, although a documented oversight may support reopening.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),
v.
LEHIGH
SOUTHWEST CEMENT
COMPANY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket
No. WEST 2015-690-M
A.C.
No. 04-00034-380538
BEFORE: Althen,
Acting Chairman; Jordan, Young, and Cohen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE
COMMISSION:
This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On November 6, 2015, the Commission received from Lehigh Southwest Cement Company (“Lehigh”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the Default Order entered against it.
On
September 3, 2015, the Chief Administrative Law Judge issued an Order to Show Cause in response to Lehigh’s failure to answer the Secretary of Labor’s July 21, 2015 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. By its terms, the Order to Show Cause was deemed a Default Order on October 5, 2015, when the operator failed to file an answer within 30 days.
MSHA records show that after Lehigh
filed a timely contest to a proposed assessment containing the citation herein and other citations, the proposed assessment was split into several dockets. The operator filed an answer to the Order to Show Cause in the other docket (WEST 2015-689-M) but did not file an answer in this docket. Lehigh states that it failed to timely answer the Order to Show Cause here because in answering the Order to Show Cause in the other docket, it overlooked the fact that the proposed assessment had been split up. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen. However, he urges Lehigh to timely file an answer to all penalty petitions and to take Orders to Show Cause seriously.
The
Judge’s jurisdiction in this matter terminated when the default occurred. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Under the Mine Act and the Commission’s procedural rules, relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2)(A)(i); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). If the Commission does not direct review within 40 days of a decision’s issuance, it becomes a final decision of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). Consequently, the Judge’s order here has become a final decision of the Commission.
Having
reviewed Lehigh’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Default Order. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ William I.
Althen
William I.
Althen, Acting Chairman
/s/ Mary Lu
Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/ Michael G.
Young
Michael G. Young,
Commissioner
/s/ Robert F.
Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen,
Jr., Commissioner
Distribution:
Ramiro
Jimenez
Area
Safety and Health Manager
Cement
Operations
24001
Stevens Creek Blvd.
Cupertino,
CA 95014
W.
Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office
of the Solicitor
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N
Washington,
DC 20004-1710
Melanie
Garris
Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance
Mine
Safety and Health Administration
U.S.
Department of Labor
201
12th St. South, Suite 500
Arlington,
VA 22202-5450
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace