Secretary of Labor v. Castle Valley Mining, LLC

Plain-English summary

Castle Valley Mining failed to contest a proposed penalty assessment within 30 days, causing it to become a final Commission order. The company asserted in a revised motion and supporting affidavit that it had timely sent the contest by first-class mail, although MSHA had no record of receiving it. Castle Valley agreed to use certified mail for future contests, and the Secretary did not oppose reopening. The Commission reopened the assessment in the interest of justice and remanded the matter for penalty proceedings. It directed the Secretary to file a penalty petition within 45 days.

Decision snapshot

• Cited authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.1(b), 2700.28
• Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
• Key point: An affidavit supporting timely mailing, coupled with a commitment to use certified mail and no opposition from the Secretary, supported reopening.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVE., N.W., SUITE 520N

WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

MINE
SAFETY AND HEALTH   

ADMINISTRATION
(MSHA),       

v.

CASTLE
VALLEY MINING, LLC,

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket
No. WEST
2015-184

A.C.
No. 42-02335-359669

BEFORE:  Jordan,
Chairman; Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners[1]

ORDER

BY THE
COMMISSION:

This
matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.   
§ 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On November 25, 2014, the Commission
received from Castle Valley Mining, LLC (“Castle”) a motion seeking to reopen a
penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C.

§
815(a).

Under
section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed
penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after
receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the
Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the
Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).

We
have held, however, that in appropriate circumstances, we possess jurisdiction to reopen uncontested
assessments that have become final Commission orders under section 105(a). Jim
Walter Res., Inc., 15 FMSHRC 782, 786-89 (May 1993) (“JWR”). In
evaluating requests to reopen final orders, the Commission has found guidance
in Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, under which the
Commission may relieve a party from a final order of the Commission on the
basis of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, or other reason justifying
relief. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.1(b) (“the Commission and its Judges shall
be guided so far as practicable by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”); JWR,
15 FMSHRC at 787. We have also observed that default is a harsh remedy and
that, if the defaulting party can make a showing of good cause for a failure to timely respond, the case may be
reopened and appropriate proceedings on the merits permitted. See Coal Prep.
Servs., Inc., 17 FMSHRC 1529, 1530 (Sept. 1995).

Records
of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”)
indicate that the proposed assessment was delivered on September 4, 2014, and
became a final order of the Commission on October 6, 2014. Following receipt of
Castle’s motion to reopen, the Commission issued a deficiency letter on July
16, 2015, and Castle filed a revised motion to reopen on August 25, 2015. Castle
asserts that it timely mailed the contest form via U.S. First Class Mail and
provided an affidavit to that effect. Additionally, Castle has agreed to send
all future contest forms via certified mail. The Secretary does not oppose the
request to reopen, but notes that MSHA's Civil Penalty Compliance Office has no
record of receiving a contest form for this case. The Secretary urges the
operator to take steps to ensure that future penalty contests are timely filed.

Having
reviewed Castle’s request and the Secretary’s
response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen this matter and remand
it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to
the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Accordingly,
consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for
assessment of penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29
C.F.R. § 2700.28.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen Jr., Commissioner

/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura

Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

Noelle
Holladay True

Rajkovich,
Williams, Kilpatrick & True, PLLC

3151
Beaumont Centre Circle, Suite 375

Lexington,
KY 40513

W.
Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office
of the Solicitor

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

Chief
Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal
Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

1331
Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 520N

Washington,
DC 20004-1710

Melanie
Garris

Office
of Civil Penalty Compliance

Mine
Safety and Health Administration

U.S.
Department of Labor

201
12th St. South, Suite 500

Arlington,
VA 22202-5450

[1] This case has
been delegated to a panel of three Commissioners pursuant to section 113(c) of
the Mine Act for the limited purpose of assessing the merits of the motion to
reopen. 30 U.S.C. § 823(c).