Ezel / Agency Decisions / west-2014-47-m-alj
FMSHRC ALJ decision Docket WEST 2014-47-M Decided June 20, 2014 Citations affirmed Judge Richard W. Manning

Secretary of Labor v. Gordon Sand Company

Secretary of Labor v. Gordon Sand Company (FMSHRC WEST 2014-47-M): Four citations affirmed after default

Apply this to your situation

This order from 2014 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2014
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision under the Mine Act's 40-day rule
This administrative law judge decision became a final decision of the Commission because no Commissioner directed review within 40 days, under 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1). It is binding on the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Gordon Sand Company faced four citations issued under section 104(a) of the Mine Act and a proposed penalty of $400. The company did not participate in a scheduled conference call, file an answer, or enter an appearance. Judge Richard W. Manning issued an order to show cause and warned that an inadequate or missing response would result in default. The company did not respond even though an agent signed the certified-mail receipt. The judge entered default, affirmed all four citations as written, found the proposed penalties reasonable under the statutory criteria, and ordered the company to pay $400 within 30 days.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.66 and 2700.102(c); 30 U.S.C. §§ 814(a) and 820(i)
  • Outcome: Four citations were affirmed as written, and the proposed $400 penalty was assessed.
  • Key point: Failure to appear and respond to a show-cause order can result in default and assessment of the Secretary's proposed penalties.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION

OFFICE OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

721 19TH
STREET, SUITE 443

DENVER, CO 80202-2536

TELEPHONE:
303-844-3577 / FAX: 303-844-5267

June 20, 2014

SECRETARY OF LABOR

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH   

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA),

Petitioner

v.

GORDON SAND COMPANY

Respondent

CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDING

Docket No. WEST 2014-47-M

A.C. No. 04-01787-332496

Gordon Sand Company

DEFAULT DECISION

This case is before me upon a petition for
assessment of civil penalty under Section 105(d) of the Federal Mine Safety and
Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (the "Act"). The
case involves four citations issued under section 104(a) and a proposed civil
penalty of $400.00. A conference call was scheduled in this
case on May 14, 2014, but Gordon Sand Company chose not to participate in the
call. A conference call is equivalent to a court appearance and is especially
important in a case designated for Simplified Proceedings. Gordon Sand Company
also failed to file an answer or enter its appearance in this case, as required
Commission Procedural Rule 102(c), which would have provided me with critical
contact information. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.102(c).

On May 14, 2014, I issued an order
to show cause against Gordon Sand Company. In the show cause order I directed
Gordon Sand Company to explain why it should not be held in
default for its failure to participate in the conference call and enter its
appearance in the case. I warned Gordon Sand that its failure to file a satisfactory
response to my order by June 11, 2014, would result in an entry of default
against Gordon Sand and the assessment of the Secretary’s proposed penalty of
$400.

Gordon Sand Company
failed to respond to my order to show cause.[1]
Consequently, Gordon Sand Company is in DEFAULT. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.66. The
four citations at issue are AFFIRMED as written by the MSHA inspector. I
have reviewed the citations and the six penalty criteria in Section 110(i) of
the Act. Based on this review I find that the penalties proposed by the
Secretary are reasonable and are hereby AFFIRMED. Gordon Sand Company is
ORDERED TO PAY the Secretary of Labor the sum of $400.00 within 30 days
of the date of this decision.[2]

/s/ Richard W. Manning

Richard W. Manning

Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

D. Scott Horn, Conference & Litigation Representative,
Mine Safety & Health Administration, 991 Nut Tree Road, 2nd
Floor, Vacaville, CA 95687 (First Class Mail)

George E. Gordon III, Gordon Sand Company, 28310 Industrial Blvd,
Suite F, Hayward, CA 94545-4436 (Certified Mail)

RWM

[1]
The order to show cause was sent to Gordon Sand
Company via certified mail. The return receipt card was returned to the
Commission with the signature of one of its agents dated May 19, 2014. I also
note that in another case, Gordon Sand Company failed to appear at a scheduled
hearing and I held the company in default. Gordon Sand Company, 30
FMSHRC 235 (March 2008).

[2]
Payment should be sent to the Mine Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Payment Office, P.O. Box
790390, St. Louis, MO 63179-0390.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 2014, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.