Secretary of Labor v. D&S Mining & Exploration (Commission decision, October 3, 2014)
Secretary of Labor v. D&S Mining & Exploration (FMSHRC WEST 2013-985-M): Address failures lead to reopening and warning
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
D&S Mining said it never received a proposed assessment and discovered the delinquency through a collection notice. The assessment had been sent to its address of record, but the delivery address was changed by hand and the package was refused; later mailings to another address were returned undelivered. The Secretary did not oppose reopening but urged the company to maintain an address that could receive assessments. The Commission reopened the case and remanded it for merits proceedings. Because D&S had previously received similar relief for non-receipt, the Commission warned that it would not reopen another case if the same circumstances occurred again.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28
- Outcome: The final penalty assessment was reopened and remanded for further proceedings.
- Key point: Non-receipt caused by address problems may justify reopening, but repeated failures to maintain a reliable address can end future relief.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20004-1710
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
D & S MINING &
EXPLORATION
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
DocketNo.
A.C. No.
WEST 2013-985-M
24-01779-302683
BEFORE: Nakamura, Acting Chairman; Cohen and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY
THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“Mine Act”). On July 23, 2013, the Commission received from D&S Mining and Exploration (“D&S”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that had become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
D&S asserts that it did not receive the proposed assessment and discovered the delinquency after it received a collection notice dated July 9, 2013. Records of the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) indicate that the proposed assessment was mailed to D&S’ address of record, but a copy of the FedEx envelope reveals that the address was changed to another, handwritten, address, and then refused by recipient. MSHA mailed another copy of the proposed assessment and a delinquency notice to another address for D&S, and they were returned undelivered. MSHA referred this case to the Department of Treasury for collection on May 23, 2013. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen, but urges the operator to take steps to ensure its address of record is an address that can receive future penalty assessments and that future penalty contests are timely filed.
Having reviewed D&S’ request and the Secretary’s response, we reopen this matter and remand it to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.1 Accordingly, consistent with Rule 28, the Secretary shall file a petition for assessment of civil penalty within 45 days of the date of this order. See 29 C.F.R. § 2700.28.
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Acting
Chairman
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ William I. Althen
William I. Althen, Commissioner
1 The Commission previously granted relief to D&S from final orders under similar circumstances of alleged non-receipt of properly-sent proposed assessments in WEST 2012-1227 and WEST 2012-1228 (May 21, 2013). D&S is hereby placed on notice that the Commission will not grant relief in the future if similar circumstances arise again.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace