Kvaerner Industrial (Commission decision, April 4, 2013)
Kvaerner Industrial Construction, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 2012-347-M): Timely show-cause response restored
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Kvaerner Industrial Construction faced default after failing to answer a penalty petition. The operator responded to two identical show-cause orders on time, and the Commission's record confirmed receipt four days later. The Secretary did not oppose reopening and confirmed that MSHA also received the response. The Commission reopened the case and remanded it for further proceedings.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.; 29 C.F.R. Part 2700
- Outcome: The defaults were reopened and the penalty proceeding was remanded.
- Key point: A timely response already received by the Commission prevented the show-cause orders from supporting default.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE
520N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-1710
April 4, 2013
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND
HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
KVAERNER INDUSTRIAL
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. WEST
2012-347-M
A.C. No. 02-00024-272861 1PL
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman;
Young and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 6, 2012, the Commission received from Kvaerner Industrial Construction, Inc. (“Kvaerner”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the default orders entered against it.
On
August 20 and 23, 2012, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued two identical Orders to Show Cause, addressed to Kvaerner and its counsel, which by their terms became Default Orders if the operator did not file an answer within 30 days. These Orders to Show Cause were issued in response to Kvaerner’s failure to answer the Secretary’s January 23, 2012 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty.
Kvaerner
asserts that it timely answered the Show Cause Orders on August 31, 2012. The record indicates that the Commission received Kvaerner’s response on September 4, 2012. The Secretary of Labor does not oppose the request to reopen, and notes that MSHA received Kvaerner’s response to the Show Cause Orders.
Having
reviewed Kvaerner’s request and the Secretary’s response, we conclude that these cases should be reopened because the operator filed a timely response to the Show Cause Orders. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.
/s/ Mary
Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Commissioner
/s/
Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/
Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Darren S. Harrington
Key Harrington Barnes, PC
3710 Rawlins, Suite 950
Dallas, TX 75219
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th
Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J.
Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review
Commission
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite
520N
Washington, D.C.
20004-1710
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace