John Richards Construction (Commission decision, June 30, 2011)
John Richards Construction (FMSHRC WEST 2011-817-M): Reopening request dismissed as moot
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2011, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
John Richards Construction asked the Commission to reopen a proposed penalty assessment that it believed may have become a final order. The Secretary reviewed the records and reported that the company had timely contested the assessment. Because the assessment never became a final Commission order, there was nothing to reopen. The Commission dismissed the request as moot.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The request to reopen was dismissed as moot because the penalty assessment had been timely contested.
- Key point: Reopening is unnecessary when the operator's timely contest prevented the proposed assessment from becoming a final order.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
June 30, 2011
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
JOHN RICHARDS CONSTRUCTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. WEST 2011-817-M
A.C. No. 24-02070-133919
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On April 1, 2011, the Commission received a request from John Richards Construction (“Richards”) to reopen a penalty assessment that may have become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
The Secretary submits that, upon reviewing the records in this proceeding, she has discovered that the proposed penalty was timely contested.
Having reviewed Richards’ request and the Secretary’s response, we find the request to reopen to be moot. Richards properly contested the proposed penalty assessment and, therefore, it did not become a final order of the Commission. Accordingly, the request to reopen is dismissed as moot.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
John Richards
John Richards Construction
P.O. Box 316
Seeley Lake, MT 59868
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace