Thompson Creek Mining Company (Commission decision, March 13, 2012)

Thompson Creek Mining Company (FMSHRC WEST 2010-1633): Default vacated after answer found in case file

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEST 2010-1633
Decided
March 13, 2012
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-03
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2012
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Chief ALJ entered default after Thompson Creek did not answer a penalty petition in the Commission's file by the show-cause deadline. Thompson Creek sought reopening, and the Secretary did not object because the regional Solicitor's office had an October 2010 answer in its case file. Although the answer did not show that it had also been sent to the Commission, the Commission reopened the proceeding in the interest of justice. It vacated the default and remanded for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing authority: Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
  • Outcome: The default order was vacated and the penalty case was remanded.
  • Key point: A documented answer in the opposing office's case file supported relief from default even though Commission service was not shown.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

March 13, 2012

SECRETARY OF LABOR, 

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) 

v.

THOMPSON CREEK MINING COMPANY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEST 2010-1633

A.C. No. 10-00531-225678

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners

ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On August 4, 2011, the Commission received from Thompson Creek Mining Company (“Thompson”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the order of default entered against it.

On May 11, 2011, Chief Administrative Law Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause and Order of Default in response to Thompson’s failure to answer the Secretary’s October 7, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The judge ordered the operator to file its answer within 30 days or it would be in default. The Commission did not receive Thompson’s answer within 30 days, so the order of default became effective on June 10, 2011.

Thompson asserts that it timely responded to the Order to Show Cause. The Secretary does not oppose the request to reopen and notes that the Denver Regional Solicitor’s Office indicated that the operator’s October 25, 2010 answer is in the case file. However, the answer does not indicate that it was also sent to the Commission, as instructed in the penalty petition.

Having reviewed Thompson’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we hereby reopen the proceeding and vacate the Order of Default. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700.

/s/ Mary Lu Jordan

Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman

/s/ Michael F. Duffy Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner

/s/Michael G. Young

Michael G. Young, Commissioner

/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.

Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner

/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura

Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

Rick Swindell

HR/Safety Representative

Thompson Creek Mining Co.

P.O. Box 62

Clayton, ID 83227

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance

MSHA

U.S. Dept. of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace