Pacific Power & Light Company (Commission decision, December 1, 2010)
Pacific Power & Light Company (FMSHRC WEST 2010-1625-M): Vacated citation makes reopening moot
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2010, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Pacific Power asked the Commission to reopen a proposed penalty assessment involving Citation No. 6419908. The Secretary reviewed the record and reported that MSHA had vacated the underlying citation. Because no penalty dispute remained to reopen, the Secretary urged dismissal on mootness grounds. The Commission denied Pacific Power's request as moot.
Decision snapshot
- Governing provision: 30 U.S.C. § 815(a)
- Outcome: The reopening request was denied as moot because MSHA had vacated the underlying citation.
- Key point: Reopening relief is unnecessary once the citation supporting the proposed assessment has been vacated.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
December 1, 2010
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. WEST 2010-1625-M
A.C. No. 48-00152-188933 U10
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On July 30, 2010, the Commission received from Pacific Power & Light Company (“Pacific Power”) a request by counsel seeking to reopen a penalty assessment that may have become a final order of the Commission pursuant to section 105(a) of the Mine Act, 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
Under section 105(a) of the Mine Act, an operator who wishes to contest a proposed penalty must notify the Secretary of Labor no later than 30 days after receiving the proposed penalty assessment. If the operator fails to notify the Secretary, the proposed penalty assessment is deemed a final order of the Commission. 30 U.S.C. § 815(a).
The Secretary submits that upon reviewing the records in this proceeding, she has determined that the underlying citation in this proceeding, Citation No. 6419908, contained on Proposed Assessment No. 000188933, has been vacated. Accordingly, she submits that the request to reopen should be denied as moot.
Having reviewed Pacific Power’s request and the Secretary’s response, we deny the request to reopen as moot because the citation in question has been vacated.
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Jason W. Hardin, Esq.
Fabian & Clendenin
215 S. State Street, Suite 1200
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2323
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA
U.S. Dept. of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd.
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace