Skyline Dredging and Excavating, Inc. (Commission decision, March 2, 2012)
Skyline Dredging and Excavating, Inc. (FMSHRC WEST 2010-1412-M): Unreceived show-cause order prevented final default
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A Chief ALJ issued a show-cause order after Skyline Dredging did not answer a penalty petition, and the order would have produced a default after 30 days. Both the petition and show-cause order were sent to Skyline's prior address and were never received. The Commission held that the default therefore had not become a final Commission order. It remanded the case and required Skyline to answer within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977
- Outcome: The nonfinal default was set aside, the case was remanded, and an answer was due within 30 days.
- Key point: A self-executing default cannot become final when the operator never receives the show-cause order that triggers it.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW
SUITE 9500
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
March 2, 2012
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)
v.
SKYLINE DREDGING
AND EXCAVATING, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Docket No. WEST 2010-1412-M
A.C. No. 24-02140-220439 Q031
BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C.
§ 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On September 13, 2011, the Commission received from Skyline Dredging and Excavating, Inc. (“Skyline”) a motion seeking to reopen a penalty assessment proceeding and relieve it from the order of default entered against it.
On March 18, 2011, Chief Judge Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause and Order of Default in response to Skyline’s failure to answer the Secretary’s August 6, 2010 Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty. The judge ordered the operator to file its answer within 30 days or it would be in default. The Commission did not receive Skyline’s answer within 30 days, so the order of default became effective on April 18, 2011.
Skyline asserts that it did not receive the Order to Show Cause or the Secretary’s previously filed Petition for Assessment of Civil Penalty because they were sent to the wrong mailing address. The Secretary does not oppose the motion to reopen, but notes that Skyline changed its address of record on April 6, 2011, after the petition and order were sent to the previous address.
Having reviewed Skyline’s request and the Secretary’s response, in the interest of justice, we conclude that the Order of Default has not become a final order of the Commission because the Order to Show Cause was never received by Skyline. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings pursuant to the Mine Act and the Commission’s Procedural Rules, 29 C.F.R. Part 2700. Skyline shall file an Answer to the Show Cause Order within 30 days of the date of this order.
/s/ Mary Lu Jordan
Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman
/s/ Michael F. Duffy
Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner
/s/Michael G. Young
Michael G. Young, Commissioner
/s/ Robert F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner
Distribution:
Rhonda Hoon
Skyline Dredging & Excavating Inc.
P.O. Box 1849
Columbia Falls, MT 59912
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20001-2021
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace