Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy, LLC
Secretary of Labor v. Signal Peak Energy, LLC (FMSHRC WEST 2010-1130): Briefing ordered on late-reporting penalty cap
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An ALJ found that Signal Peak failed to notify MSHA within 15 minutes after a roof cave-in injured a miner and increased the proposed $51,400 penalty to $74,250. Both parties agreed that amount exceeded the $70,000 general maximum for a non-flagrant violation. The Commission identified a further question: whether the more specific $65,000 maximum for failure to provide immediate accident notification governed instead. It requested briefing on whether section 50.10(b) and section 50.10(d) violations were subject to the $65,000 or $70,000 cap and how the differing statutory inflation adjustments should be reconciled. The order did not decide the penalty and required the parties to respond within 30 days.
Decision snapshot
- Governing authority: 30 U.S.C. §§ 813(j), 820(a)(1), and 820(a)(2); 30 C.F.R. §§ 50.10 and 100.4(c)
- Outcome: The Commission requested supplemental briefing on the maximum penalty for the immediate-notification violation.
- Key point: The specific penalty range for 15-minute accident reporting may control over the general non-flagrant maximum, requiring analysis of the statutory provisions and inflation adjustments.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1331
PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW, SUITE 520N
WASHINGTON,
DC 20004-1710
September 25, 2014
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH :
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA) : Docket
No. WEST 2010-1130
:
v. :
:
SIGNAL PEAK ENERGY, LLC
:
BEFORE: Nakamura, Acting
Chairman; Cohen and Althen, Commissioners
ORDER
BY
THE COMMISSION:
This
case involves review of an Administrative Law Judge’s decision affirming two
citations issued to Signal Peak Energy in the wake of a roof cave-in which
injured a miner. 34 FMSHRC 1346 (June 2012) (ALJ).
With
regard to Citation No. 8463717, the Judge found that Signal Peak violated
section 50.10(b) and/or 50.10(d) of the Secretary of Labor’s reporting
requirements by failing to timely notify the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety
and Health Administration (“MSHA”) of the injury and/or roof cave-in.1 The Judge raised the
$51,400 special assessment proposed by the Secretary to $74,250. 34 FMSHRC
at 1346 n.1.
Signal
Peak contends and the Secretary agrees that the Judge erred by imposing a
penalty in excess of the $70,000 maximum for non-flagrant violations of
mandatory standards provided by section 110(a)(1) of the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2012) (“the Act”).2 Sec’y Br. at 35; SP Br.
at 27.
As
explained below, the Commission requests additional briefing on the
applicability of the $65,000 maximum for immediate notification violations
provided by section 110(a)(2).3
Section 50.10 requires an
operator to contact MSHA within 15 minutes once it knows or should know that
an accident, as defined in subsections (a) through (d), has occurred. See n.1.
Subsections (a), (b) and (c)
parallel section 103(j) of the Act, which states that an operator shall
notify the Secretary “within 15 minutes of the time at
which the operator realizes that the death of an individual at the mine, or an
injury or entrapment of an individual at the mine which has a reasonable
potential to cause death, has occurred.” 30 U.S.C. § 813(j). Pursuant to
section 110(a)(2) of the Act (as adjusted for inflation), the failure to
provide timely notification as required by section 103(j) shall be assessed a
civil penalty by the Secretary of not less than
$5,000, and not more than $65,000. See
n.3. In contrast, section 110(a)(1) (as adjusted for inflation) provides
that an operator shall be assessed a penalty by the Secretary of not more than
$70,000 for a non-flagrant violation of a mandatory standard or provision of
the Act. See n.2.
Section 50.10 achieved its
current form in 2009, when reference to “accidents” generally was replaced with
subsections (a) through (d). The Secretary explained that the change would “make
it readily apparent when the violation is subject to the higher penalty,” as
subsections (a), (b) and (c) would automatically be subject to the Secretary’s
corresponding penalty provision for section 103(j) violations,4 while subsection (d) would not. 74
Fed. Reg. 68918, 68918-19 (Dec. 29, 2009). Also in 2009, the relevant penalty
provision was moved from 30 C.F.R. § 100.5, which otherwise addresses special
assessments, to section 100.4, which otherwise provides minimum proposed
penalties for unwarrantable failure violations. The Secretary noted,
however, that “MSHA [would] continue to
review these violations for a special assessment
when conditions warrant.” Id.
It is also notable that when
section 110(a)(2) was enacted under the Mine Improvement and New Emergency
Response Act of 2006 (“MINER Act”), sections 110(a)(1) and (a)(2) both provided
a maximum assessable penalty of $60,000. Pub. L. No. 109-236; 30 C.F.R. § 100.3
(2006). The legislative history of the MINER Act indicates that this
correlation was intentional. S. Rep. No. 109-365, at 13 (2006) (“fix[ing] a
minimum civil penalty of $5,000, up to $60,000 (which is the current maximum)”).
The Secretary subsequently adjusted both for inflation via rulemaking, pursuant
to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. No.
101-410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. § 2461 note)), as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321). The
general maximum was increased to $70,000 in 2008, and the maximum for section
103(j) violations was increased to $65,000 in 2012. 73 Fed. Reg. 7206, 7207-08
(Feb. 7, 2008); 77 Fed. Reg. 76406, 76406-07 (Dec. 28, 2012). The Secretary has
stated that the adjustments “are prescribed by the Inflation Adjustment Act and
are not within MSHA's discretion.” 77 Fed. Reg. at 76406-07. Both adjustments
are reflected in the Secretary’s current regulations addressing proposed
penalty assessments. 30 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), 100.4(c).
In light of this statutory framework, the
Commission requests further briefing from the parties regarding the maximum
assessable penalty for Citation No. 8463717 under each theory of liability. Specifically,
the parties are requested to address the following questions:
-
Are violations of section 50.10(b) subject to a
maximum penalty of $65,000 under section 110(a)(2) of the Act, or $70,000 under
section 110(a)(1)? The parties should
address the relevance of the initial correlation between the maximum assessable
penalties. The parties should also discuss the relevance (if any) of the
distinction between section 110(a)(2), which provides both minimum and maximum
penalty amounts for violations of section 103(j), and section 110(a)(3), which
provides only a minimum penalty for unwarrantable failure violations issued
under section 104(d). -
Are violations of section 50.10(d) subject to a
maximum penalty of $65,000 under section 110(a)(2), or $70,000 under section
110(a)(1)? The parties should address
whether it conflicts with congressional intent to allow a higher penalty to be
assessed for failing to report a general accident under section 50.10(d), than
for failing to report a death, or injury or entrapment with the potential to
cause death, under sections 50.10(a), (b) or (c).
The parties are requested to file briefs,
or alternatively, to notify the Commission that briefs will not be filed,
within 30 days of the date of this order.
/s/ Patrick K. Nakamura
Patrick K. Nakamura,
Acting Chairman
/s/ Robert
F. Cohen, Jr.
Robert F. Cohen,
Jr., Commissioner
/s/
William I. Althen
William I. Althen,
Commissioner
Distribution:
R. Henry Moore, Esq.
Jackson Kelly, PLLC
Three Gateway Center, Suite 1500
401 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Melanie Garris
Office of Civil Penalty Compliance
MSHA
U.S. Dept. Of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor
Arlington, VA 22209-3939
W. Christian Schumann, Esq.
Office of the Solicitor
U.S. Department of Labor
1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220
Arlington, VA 22209-2296
Administrative Law Judge William B. Moran
Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission
Office of Administrative Law Judges
1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Suite 520N
Washington, D.C. 20004
1
Section 50.10 states that an “operator shall immediately contact MSHA at once
without delay and within 15 minutes . . . once the operator knows or should
know that an accident has occurred” involving:
(a) A
death of an individual at the mine;
(b) An
injury of an individual at the mine which has a reasonable potential to cause
death;
(c) An
entrapment of an individual at the mine which has a reasonable potential to
cause death; or
(d) Any
other accident.
30
C.F.R. § 50.10.
2 Section 110(a)(1) of the Act states that the “operator
of a coal or other mine in which a violation occurs of a mandatory health or
safety standard or who violates any other provision of this [Act], shall be
assessed a civil penalty by the Secretary which penalty shall not be more than
$50,000 for each such violation.” 30 U.S.C. § 820(a)(1). As discussed infra,
the maximum has been adjusted to $70,000 through rulemaking to account for
inflation. See 30 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).
3 Section 110(a)(2) of the Act states that the “operator
of a coal or other mine who fails to provide timely notification to the
Secretary as required under section 103(j) of this [Act] (relating to the 15
minute requirement) shall be assessed a civil penalty by the Secretary of not
less than $5,000 and not more than $60,000.” 30 U.S.C. § 820(a)(2). Similar to
section 110(a)(1), the maximum has been adjusted to $65,000 to account for
inflation. See 30 C.F.R. § 100.4(c).
4 The relevant regulatory provision is section
100.4(c), which, like section 110(a)(2) of the Act, states that “[t]he penalty
for failure to provide timely notification to the Secretary under section
103(j) of the Mine Act will be not less than $5,000 and not more than $65,000
for the following accidents: (1) The death of an individual at the mine, or (2)
An injury or entrapment of an individual at the mine, which has a reasonable
potential to cause death.” 30 C.F.R. § 100.4(c).
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2014. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.