Dynatec Mining Corporation (Commission decision, January 6, 2011)

Dynatec Mining Corporation (FMSHRC WEST 2009-434-M): Default vacated after timely filings

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
WEST 2009-434-M
Decided
January 6, 2011
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-08

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2011, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2011
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance under 30 U.S.C. § 816; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Chief Administrative Law Judge entered default judgment after concluding that Dynatec had not answered the Secretary's penalty petition or a later show-cause order. Dynatec told the Commission that it had timely filed both an answer to the petition and a response explaining that earlier filing. The Secretary did not oppose review or dispute those assertions. The Commission granted the timely petition for review, vacated the default in the interest of justice, and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Governing provisions: 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2) and 29 C.F.R. §§ 2700.69(b) and 2700.70(a)
  • Outcome: The default order was vacated and the penalty case was remanded.
  • Key point: A default should not stand when the undisputed record shows that the operator timely filed the required responses.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

601 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, NW

SUITE 9500

WASHINGTON, DC 20001

January 6, 2011

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH

ADMINISTRATION (MSHA)

v.

DYNATEC MINING CORPORATION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Docket No. WEST 2009-434-M

A.C. No. 42-02426-172386 WJ6

BEFORE: Jordan, Chairman; Duffy, Young, Cohen, and Nakamura, Commissioners

DIRECTION FOR REVIEW AND ORDER

BY THE COMMISSION:

This matter arises under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (2006) (“Mine Act”). On December 23, 2008, the Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued Proposed Assessment No. 000172386 to Dynatec Mining Corp. (“Dynatec”). On March 9, 2009, after Dynatec had timely contested the proposed penalty, the Secretary of Labor (“Secretary”) filed a petition for assessment of civil penalty with the Commission regarding the contested penalty. On August 17, 2010, Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert Lesnick issued an Order to Show Cause to Dynatec for failure to file an answer to the Secretary’s petition. On December 2, 2010, the judge issued an Order of Default entering judgement for the Secretary and directing Dynatec to pay the proposed civil penalty immediately. On December 14, 2010, the Commission received a petition for discretionary review from Dynatec, requesting that the Commission issue an order directing review and vacating the default order.

In support of its petition, Dynatec states that on April 10, 2009, it timely filed its answer to the petition. Dynatec further states that it filed an answer to the show cause order on September 22, 2010, explaining that it had previously filed an answer to the Secretary’s petition. On December 15, 2010, the Commission received a letter from the Secretary stating that she does not oppose Dynatec’s petition for discretionary review. The Secretary did not dispute any of Dynatec’s assertions.

The Chief Judge’s jurisdiction over this case terminated when he issued his default order on December 2, 2010. 29 C.F.R. § 2700.69(b). Relief from a judge’s decision may be sought by filing a petition for discretionary review within 30 days of its issuance. 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 2700.70(a). We conclude that Dynatec’s petition for discretionary review was timely filed, and we hereby grant it.

Upon review of the record, in the interest of justice, we hereby vacate the Order of Default and remand this matter to the Chief Judge for further appropriate proceedings. See REB Enterprises, Inc., 18 FMSHRC 311 (Mar. 1996).


Mary Lu Jordan, Chairman


Michael F. Duffy, Commissioner


Michael G. Young, Commissioner


Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Commissioner


Patrick K. Nakamura, Commissioner

Distribution:

C. Gregory Ruffennach, Esq.,

for Dynatec Mining Corporation

1629 K Street, Suite 300

Washington, DC 20036

e-mail: [email protected]

W. Christian Schumann, Esq.

Office of the Solicitor

U.S. Department of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2220

Arlington, VA 22209-2296

Melanie Garris

Office of Civil Penalty Compliance, MSHA

U.S. Dept. of Labor

1100 Wilson Blvd., 25th Floor

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

Chief Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Lesnick

Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

601 New Jersey Avenue, N. W., Suite 9500

Washington, D.C. 20001-2021

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace